Safety Standard for Bassinets and Cradles 16 CFR Part 1218, Notice of Reopening of Comment Period to

Description

Federal Register/Vol. 75, No. 138/Tuesday, July 20, 2010/Proposed Rules 42017 fill out, endorse and file the required that would be affected, the economic Availability of Rulemaking Documents paperwork. As such, the cost for a one- impact of the proposed regulation on You can get an electronic copy of year period would be $94 (1 hour × $94 these small entities, and whether there rulemaking documents using the per hour). are any less burdensome alternatives Internet by— In addition to the paperwork that that still meet the agency’s statutory 1. Searching the Federal eRulemaking would be required as a result of this objectives. Portal (http://www.regulations.gov); proposal, it is expected that some flight 2. Visiting the FAA’s Regulations and Additional Information operations would not be authorized. Policies web page at http:// Without authorization from the FAA to Comments Invited www.faa.gov/regulations_policies; or conduct these flights, the operator’s The FAA invites interested persons to 3. Accessing the Government Printing inability to conduct such operations participate in this rulemaking by Office’s web page at http:// would result in a significant economic submitting written comments, data, or www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/index.html. impact. views. The most helpful comments will You can also get a copy by sending a The FAA has used Department of reference a specific portion of the request to the Federal Aviation Transportation Form 41 data for the ...

Informations

• Publié par: Phyan
• Nombre de lectures: 83
• Langue: English

Extrait

Federal Register/ Tuesday,75, No. 138/ ProposedJuly 20, 2010Rules/ Vol.

42017

fill out, endorse and file the requiredthat would be affected, the economicAvailability of Rulemaking Documents paperwork. As such, the cost for a one impact of the proposed regulation on You can get an electronic copy of year period would be $94 (1 hour×$94 these small entities, and whether there rulemaking documents using the per hour). are any less burdensome alternatives Internet by— In addition to the paperwork that that still meet the agency’s statutory 1. Searching the Federal eRulemaking would be required as a result of this objectives. Portal (http://www.regulations.gov); proposal, it is expected that some flight Additional Information 2. Visiting the FAA’s Regulations and operations would not be authorized. Policies web page athttp:// Without authorization from the FAA to Comments Invited www.faa.gov/regulations_policies; or conduct these flights, the operator’s The FAA invites interested persons to 3. Accessing the Government Printing inability to conduct such operations participate in this rulemaking by Office’s web page athttp:// would result in a significant economic submitting written comments, data, or www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/index.html. impact. views. The most helpful comments will You can also get a copy by sending a The FAA has used Department of reference a specific portion of the request to the Federal Aviation Transportation Form 41 data for the Supplemental Regulatory Flexibility Administration, Office of Rulemaking, total operating revenue per flight for Analysis or related rulemaking ARM–1, 800 Independence Avenue, international cargo operations of U.S. document, explain the reason for any SW., Washington, DC 20591, or by Operators. In 2009, the reported median recommended change, and include calling (202) 267–9680. Make sure to revenue estimate was approximately supporting data. To ensure the docket identify the docket or SFAR number of $70,000 per flight, although the profit does not contain duplicate comments, this rulemaking. would be substantially less. As the please submit a single copy of your You may access all documents the number of flights currently operating written or electronic comments only one FAA considered in developing the would continue for the foreseeable time. proposed rule, including economic future, operators who eliminate flights All comments we receive will be filed analyses and technical reports, from the as a result of the proposed rule would in the docket, as well as a report internet through the Federal incur a significant economic loss. The summarizing each substantive public eRulemaking Portal referenced in proposal would affect‘‘more than just a contact with FAA personnel concerning paragraph (1). few’’operators who fly in Afghanistan. the proposed rulemaking. Before acting As such, we believe flights would be Issued in Washington, DC, on July 15, on the proposal, we will consider all 2010. eliminated for a substantial number of comments we receive on or before the operators. Pamela HamiltonPowell, closing date for comments. We will The requirements of this proposal Director, Office of Rulemaking. consider comments filed after the would have a significant economic [FR Doc. 2010–17762 Filed 7–19–10; 8:45 am] comment period has closed if it is impact on a substantial number of small BILLING CODE 4910–13–P possible to do so without incurring entities. expense or delay. We may make changes 5. Relevant federal rules that may to the proposal in light of the comments duplicate, overlap, or conflict with the CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY we receive. proposed rule. COMMISSION The FAA is unaware that the rule Proprietary or Confidential Business would overlap, duplicate, or conflict Information 16 CFR Part 1218 with existing federal rules. Do not file in the docket information 6. Significant Alternatives RIN 3041–AC81 that you consider to be proprietary or Considered. confidential business information. Send Maintain the status quo:Continue to Safety Standard for Bassinets and or deliver this information directly to allow all flights to occur without Cradles the person identified in the FOR FURTHER requiring steps to manage the risks to AGENCY :Consumer Product Safety INFORMATION CONTACT section of this these operations from insurgent activity Commission. document. You must mark the or an approval or exemption from the information that you consider ACTION :Notice of reopening of comment FAA. The FAA is responsible for both the proprietary or confidential. If you send period. safety of flight in the United States and the information on a disk or CD–ROM, SUMMARY :The Consumer Product Safety for the safety of U.S.registered aircraft mark the outside of the disk or CD–ROM Commission (‘‘CPSC’’or‘‘Commission’’) and U.S. operators throughout the and also identify electronically within is reopening the comment period for its world. The FAA rejected this alternative the disk or CD–ROM the specific proposed rule on the Safety Standard for and has not identified any significant information that is proprietary or Bassinets and Cradles. The reopened alternatives to the proposed rule which confidential. comment period will expire on accomplish the stated objectives of Under 14 CFR 11.35(b), when we are September 10, 2010. applicable statutes and which minimize aware of proprietary information filed DATES :Written comments in response to any significant economic impact of the with a comment, we do not place it in this document must be received by the proposed rule on small entities. the docket. We hold it in a separate file The FAA has determined that theto which the public does not have Commission no later than September 10, proposed rule would have a significantaccess, and we place a note in the 2010. economic impact on a substantialdocket that we have received it. If we ADDRESSES :You may submit comments, number of small entities. Therefore, wereceive a request to examine or copy identified by Docket No. CPSC–2010– have prepared the above Supplemental this information, we treat it as any other 0028, by any of the following methods: Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. Werequest under the Freedom of Electronic Submissions solicit comments on this determination.Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552). We We also solicit comments on theprocess such a request under the DOTSubmit electronic comments in the analysis of the number of small entitiesprocedures found in 49 CFR part 7. following way:Federal eRulemaking

VerDate Mar<15>201015:03 Jul 19, 2010Jkt 220001PO 00000Frm 00018Fmt 4702Sfmt 4702E:\FR\FM\20JYP1.SGM 20JYP1

42018

Federal Register/ Vol.Rules/ Tuesday,75, No. 138/ ProposedJuly 20, 2010

Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.public comment period which ended onin the area. Preliminary data available Follow the instructions for submittingJuly 12, 2010.for 2010 is consistent with continued comments. To ensure timely processing Although the NPR was posted on the attainment. EPA is also proposing to of comments, the Commission is no CPSC’s Web site at the same time it was approve, as a revision to the Michigan longer accepting comments submitted published in theFederal Register State Implementation Plan (SIP), the , the by electronic mail (email) except NPR was not posted on the State’s plan for maintaining the 8hour throughhttp://www.regulations.gov.ozone NAAQS through 2021 in the area. regulations.gov Web site until June 23, 2010. Additionally, after publication of EPA is proposing to approve the 2005 Written Submissions the NPR, Commission staff met with emissions inventory submitted with the Submit written submissions in the various parties concerning test methods redesignation request as meeting the following way: described in the NPR. The Commission comprehensive emissions inventory is placing summaries of those meetings requirement of the CAA for the Allegan Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for paper into the administrative record. To County area. Finally, EPA is proposing (preferably in five copies), disk, or CD– ensure that all interested parties have to find adequate and approve the State’s ROM submissions), to:Office of the adequate notice of this NPR and the 2021 Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets Secretary, Consumer Product Safety meeting summaries and the ability to (MVEBs) for the Allegan County area. Commission, Room 502, 4330 East West comment on them, the Commission is DATES : Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814;Comments must be received on reopening the docket to continue to telephone [phone].or before August 19, 2010. receive public comments until Instructions:All submissions received ADDRESSES :Submit your comments, September 10, 2010. must include the agency name and identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– docket number for this rulemaking. All Dated: July 14, 2010. OAR–2010–0477, by one of the comments received may be posted Todd A. Stevenson, following methods: without change, including any personal 1.http://www.regulations.gov:Follow Secretary, Consumer Product Safety identifiers, contact information, or other Commission. the online instructions for submitting personal information provided, to comments. [FR Doc. 2010–17596 Filed 7–19–10; 8:45 am] http://www.regulations.gov. 2. Do not Email: [e-mail]. BILLING CODE 6355–01–P submit confidential business3.Fax:[phone]. information, trade secret information, or 4.Mail:Jay Bortzer, Chief, Air other sensitive or protected information Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION electronically; if furnished at all, such Environmental Protection Agency, 77 AGENCY information should be submitted in West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, writing. Illinois60604. 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 5.Hand delivery:Jay Bortzer, Chief, Docket:For access to the docket to [EPA–R05–OAR–2010–0477; FRL–9176–4] Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. read background comments or Environmental Protection Agency, 77 comments received, go tohttp:// Approval and Promulgation of West Jackson Boulevard, 18th floor, www.regulations.gov. Implementation Plans and Designation Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such deliveries of Areas for Air Quality Planning FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :For are only accepted during the Regional Purposes; Michigan; Redesignation of information about submitting Office normal hours of operation, and the Allegan County Area to Attainment comments, call or write to Rockelle special arrangements should be made for Ozone Hammond, Office of the Secretary, for deliveries of boxed information. The Consumer Product Safety Commission, AGENCY : Regional Office official hours of Environmental Protection Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone (301) Agency (EPA). business are Monday through Friday, 504–6833. 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding ACTION :Proposed rule. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :On April Federal holidays. 28, 2010, the Commission published a SUMMARY :EPA is proposing to approve Instructions:Direct your comments to notice of proposed rulemaking (‘‘NPR’’) Michigan’sDocket ID No. EPA–R05–OAR–2010– request to redesignate the in theFederal Registertitled,‘‘0477. EPA’s policy is that all commentsSafety Allegan County, Michigan 8hour ozone Standard for Bassinets and Cradles’’received will be included in the public area to attainment for the (75 nonattainment FR 22303). The Commission issued the 1997 8hour ozone standard, because docket without change and may be NPR pursuant to section 104(b) of the the request meets the statutory made available online athttp:// Consumer Product Safety Improvement requirements for redesignation under www.regulations.gov,including any Act of 2008 (‘‘CPSIA’’) which requirespersonal information provided, unless the Clean Air Act (CAA). The Michigan the Commission to promulgate Department of Natural Resources and the comment includes information consumer product safety standards for Environment (MDNRE) submitted this claimed to be Confidential Business durable infant or toddler products. request on May 24, 2010 and Information (CBI) or other information These standards are to be‘‘ it on June 16, 2010. whose disclosure is restricted by statute.substantially supplemented the same as’’This proposed approval involvesapplicable voluntaryDo not submit information that you standards or more stringent than theseveral related actions. EPA isconsider to be CBI or otherwise voluntary standard if the Commissionproposing to determine that the Alleganprotected throughhttp:// concludes that more stringentCounty area has attained the 8hourwww.regulations.govor email. The requirements would further reduce theozone National Ambient Air Qualityhttp://www.regulations.govWeb site is risk of injury associated with theStandard (NAAQS). This determinationan‘‘anonymous access’’system, which product. The NPR proposed a moreis based on three years of complete,means EPA will not know your identity stringent safety standard for bassinetsqualityassured ambient air qualityor contact information unless you and cradles that will further reduce themonitoring data for the 2007–2009provide it in the body of your comment. risk of injury associated with theseozone seasons that demonstrate that theIf you send an email comment directly products. The NPR provided a 75day8hour ozone NAAQS has been attainedto EPA without going throughhttp://

VerDate Mar<15>201015:03 Jul 19, 2010Jkt 220001PO 00000Frm 00019Fmt 4702Sfmt 4702E:\FR\FM\20JYP1.SGM 20JYP1