Disciplinary Committee Adjourns Charges Against Hampshire Vet
2 pages
English

Disciplinary Committee Adjourns Charges Against Hampshire Vet

Le téléchargement nécessite un accès à la bibliothèque YouScribe
Tout savoir sur nos offres
2 pages
English
Le téléchargement nécessite un accès à la bibliothèque YouScribe
Tout savoir sur nos offres

Description

Disciplinary Committee Adjourns Charges Against Hampshire Vet PR Newswire LONDON, September 12, 2012 LONDON, September 12, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- The Disciplinary Committee of the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons (RCVS) yesterday [11 September 2012] agreed to adjourn multiple charges against a Hampshire-based veterinary surgeon who first registered in 1950, following his undertakings firstly to request removal from the RCVS Register and secondly never apply to be restored to it. At yesterday's hearing, William Bamber Cartmell of Wickham, near Fareham, was due to face seven heads of charge containing "serious allegations" relating to his provision of expert evidence in a case involving the RSPCA; his certification, following clinical examination, of the health of two horses for a prospective purchaser; and, his clinical competence during treatment of a Cavalier King Charles Spaniel called Milly. However, before the Committee considered any of the facts behind these charges - all of which Mr Cartmell denied - the College submitted an application suggesting that they should be adjourned, providing that Mr Cartmell agreed to the three undertakings (the third being not to act as an expert witness in litigation in future). The College also suggested that, should Mr Cartmell subsequently apply to be restored to the Register, the Committee should resume its consideration of the charges, along with his breach of the undertakings.

Informations

Publié par
Nombre de lectures 23
Langue English

Extrait

Disciplinary Committee Adjourns Charges Against Hampshire Vet
PR Newswire LONDON, September 12, 2012
LONDON,September 12, 2012/PRNewswire/ --The Disciplinary Committee of the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons (RCVS) yesterday [11 September 2012] agreed to adjourn multiple charges against a Hampshire-based veterinary surgeon who first registered in 1950, following his undertakings firstly to request removal from the RCVS Register and secondly never apply to be restored to it. At yesterday's hearing, William Bamber Cartmell of Wickham, near Fareham, was due to face seven heads of charge containing "serious allegations" relating to his provision of expert evidence in a case involving the RSPCA; his certification, following clinical examination, of the health of two horses for a prospective purchaser; and, his clinical competence during treatment of a Cavalier King Charles Spaniel called Milly. However, before the Committee considered any of the facts behind these charges - all of which Mr Cartmell denied - the College submitted an application suggesting that they should be adjourned, providing that Mr Cartmell agreed to the three undertakings (the third being not to act as an expert witness in litigation in future). The College also suggested that, should Mr Cartmell subsequently apply to be restored to the Register, the Committee should resume its consideration of the charges, along with his breach of the undertakings. The Committee was advised that none of the complainants in the case - which could have exceeded four weeks and incurred considerable costs - dissented from the proposed course of action. It also heard that Mr Cartmell had recently retired from his practice, which was now closed and his clients dispersed to other practices. In over 60 years of practising, there had been no adverse disciplinary findings against him. Speaking on behalf of the Disciplinary Committee, its Chairman, Professor Peter Lees, said: "Having carefully considered the matters put before us, we have concluded that it would not be in the public interest to refuse the College's application and proceed with this case. "We are satisfied that the undertakings offered by the Respondent protect the welfare of animals and uphold the reputation of the profession. [These undertakings also] go beyond any sanction that this Committee could impose at the conclusion of a contested hearing where any of the heads of charge were found proven. "We do not consider that it would be proportionate for either party to incur the substantial costs of a contested hearing. We have also paid particular regard to the age of the Respondent and to his length of service without any adverse findings having been made against him." NOTES FOR EDITORS 1. 1)The RCVS is the regulatory body for veterinary surgeons and veterinary nurses in the UK and deals with issues of professional misconduct, maintaining the Registers of veterinar sureons and of veterinarnurses and assurinstandards of veterinar
education. It also has a 'Royal College' role, which means that it is responsible for postgraduate veterinary and veterinary nursing qualifications.
2) RCVSdisciplinary powers are exercised through the Preliminary Investigation and Disciplinary Committees, established in accordance with Schedule 2 to the Veterinary Surgeons Act 1966 (the 1966 Act). The RCVS has authority to deal with three types of case: a) Fraudulentregistration b) Criminalconvictions c) Allegationsof disgraceful professional conduct 3) TheDisciplinary Committee is a constituted judicial tribunal under the 1966 Act and follows rules of evidence similar to those used in a court of law. 4) Theburden of proving an allegation falls upon the RCVS, and the RCVS must prove to the standard that the Committee is sure. 5) Furtherinformation about the hearing and the charges against Mr Cartmell, as well as the Committee's decision and Mr Cartmell's undertakings, can be found at http://www.rcvs.org.uk/disciplinary. Ian Holloway RCVS Belgravia House 62-64 Horseferry Road London SW1P 2AF Tel: +44(0)20-7202-0727 Fax: +44(0)20-7202-0740 i.holloway@rcvs.org.uk
  • Univers Univers
  • Ebooks Ebooks
  • Livres audio Livres audio
  • Presse Presse
  • Podcasts Podcasts
  • BD BD
  • Documents Documents