Pragmatic Anti-Virus Testing
4 pages
Français

Découvre YouScribe en t'inscrivant gratuitement

Je m'inscris

Pragmatic Anti-Virus Testing

-

Découvre YouScribe en t'inscrivant gratuitement

Je m'inscris
Obtenez un accès à la bibliothèque pour le consulter en ligne
En savoir plus
4 pages
Français
Obtenez un accès à la bibliothèque pour le consulter en ligne
En savoir plus

Description

Pragmatic Anti-Virus Testing

Sujets

Informations

Publié par
Nombre de lectures 39
Langue Français

Extrait

Reprinted by permission: VIRUS BULLETIN. SEPTEMBER 2001.
Pragmatic Anti-Virus Testing
Joe Wells
AVTestLab.com, USA
If our industry is to follow the pattern of the rest of the computing world, AV companies will
soon become application service providers and, before long, the service capabilities of AV
vendors will become the most important aspect of the industry. It is important that anti-virus test
methodologies are revised to reflect these changes in the use of AV products.
Mass-mailing threats have demonstrated the need to refocus testing. Once these threats appeared,
anti-virus ceased to be simply ‘a product’ and customer service became a critical consideration.
The AV company’s ability to respond rapidly to a time-critical threat has come to the fore.
Pragmatic testing addresses the more important issues relating to AV products, especially where
time and financial constraints play a part. While I believe such testing should include the
traditional issues, it should, in addition, be expanded to include the testing of anti-virus services.
Good Testing Requires Good Input
Companies and testing organizations can access two key resources for input on what needs to be
tested.
We can talk to technical managers in large corporations who deal with AV problems every day.
(Now, there’s a novel idea: ask users what they want to see tested.) This means it’s time to admit
that these people know their jobs and know what they need. In the past, some AV ‘experts’ have
interpreted user requests as ‘wants’ as opposed to ‘needs’. (‘We know better than the users. We’ll
give them what they really need.’) This ideology is wrong. We do not know the users’ situation
and environment better than they do. When they say they need something, they genuinely do need
it. We must listen to them – recognizing them as the professionals they are. Taking their requests
and suggestions into consideration will help us fulfill their needs.
There are resources available to us within our own industry. A testing organization can ask an AV
company how their product should be tested: QA staff should be asked what they test and how
they do it, and technical support staff should be asked what ‘really’ needs to be tested in a
product, based on their experience of the problems they have encountered.
Good Testing Requires Good Testers
What makes for a qualified tester? As in any other field, testing requires knowledge, experience
and meticulous methods. In addition, there are issues unique to the testing of anti-virus products
and services that require a more specialized knowledge.
For example, one critical and often overlooked issue is the tendency to immediately suspect the
AV product when a virus sample is missed. Given the historical quality of viruses and anti-virus
products, it is preferable that the tester should suspect the virus sample immediately, rather than
the product. It is far more likely that the sample is bad, than the product. This leads us to some of
the unique aspects of tester qualifications.
  • Univers Univers
  • Ebooks Ebooks
  • Livres audio Livres audio
  • Presse Presse
  • Podcasts Podcasts
  • BD BD
  • Documents Documents