COLEGIUL DE REDACłIE/EDITORIAL BOARD EDITOR +EF/SENIOR EDITOR:Marius Grec DIRECTOR/DIRECTOR:Cristian BenŃeSECRETAR DE REDACłIE/ASSOCIATE EDITOR:Oana MateiDIRECTOR EXECUTIV/ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR:Regis RomanMEMBRI/EDITORIAL BOARD: inMarŃian Iovan,Viorel Prelici, Constantin Grecu, Dor Bătrîn, Nicolae Iuga, Dana Jalobeanu, Stelean Boia, Sorin Bulboacă, Claudiu Porumbăcean, Simona Stiger, Mariana Popa, Simona Macarie, Ioan LesuŃan, Nicoleta Lăsan, Glazer Vendelin.CONSILIUL +TIINłIFIC INTERNAłIONAL/INTERNATIONAL A DVISORY BOARD Iordan BĂRBULESCU, +coala NaŃională de +tiinŃe Politice ,i Administrative, Facultatea de +tiinŃe Politice, Departamentul de RelaŃii InternaŃionale ,i Integrare Europeană Marcel BECKER, Radbound University Nijmegen, The Netherlands Călin HINłEA, Univeristatea Babe,6Bolyai,Facultatea de +tiinŃe Politice, Administrative ,i ale ComunicăriiOlivier KERAMIDAS, Institut de Management Public et Gouvernance Territoriale, Université Paul Cézanne, Aix Marseille III, France Alan LAWTON, The University of Hull, Hull University Business School, U.K. Fabienne MARON, Scientific Administrator, European Affairs Manager, European Group for Public Administration, Belgium Ani MATEI, +coala NaŃională de +tiinŃe Politice ,i Administrative, Facultatea de AdministraŃie Publică Lucica MATEI, +coala NaŃională de +tiinŃe Politice ,i Administrative, Facultatea de AdministraŃie Publică Joseph MIFSUD, President of EMUNI University, Slovenia Vasile MORAR, Universitatea din Bucure,ti, Facultatea de Filosofie Tina NABATCHI, Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University, U.S.A. Ugur OMURGONULSEN, Hacettepe University, Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Turkey Sandra PRALONG, SynergEtica, FundaŃia pentru o societate etică Claude ROCHET, Institut de Management Public et Gouvernance Territoriale, Université Paul Cézanne, Aix Marseille III, France Petre ROMAN, Institutul Politehnic Bucure,ti, Facultatea de Energetică Verginia VEDINA+, Universitatea din Bucure,ti, Facultatea de Drept
CUPRINS CINISM CLASIC, CINISM MODERN +I IMPLICAłII PENTRU P ROCESUL DEMOCRATICMatei Oana..............................................................................................................................5 MOÂDEGLAULSOCIETĂłIIROMÂNE+TIPOSTADERARE.OABORDAREDEST N Dobrescu Smaranda................................................................................................................15 GEN +I CUTUME SOCIALE Bernea Ilinca...........................................................................................................................26 CĂLĂTORI ÎN MARELE SPAłIU AL GLOBALIZĂRII – FENOMEN UL MIGRAłIEI +I IMPLICAłIILE SALE LA NIVELUL FAMILIE Arsene Andreea.......................................................................................................................31 CARACTERISTICI ALE SFEREI PUBLICE ROM NE+TI +I CONFIG URAREA POSTDECEMBRISTĂ A STRUCTURII SOCIALE Darie Despa Nadina................................................................................................................42 ARMONIZAREA LEGISLATIEI ARHIVISTICE ROMANESTI CU CE A EUROPEANA SI PREGATIREA PERSONALULUI RESPONSABIL CU ACTIVITATEA DE ARHIVA Porumbăcean Claudiu.............................................................................................................57 CÂTEVA CONSIDERAłII PRIVIND ÎNCEPUTURILE ADMINISTRA łIEI PUBLICE CA DISCIPLINĂ ACADEMICĂ BenŃe Cristian..........................................................................................................................69
CINISM CLASIC, CINISM MODERN +I IMPLICAłII PENTRU PROCESUL DEMOCRATIC KYNICISM, CYNICISM AND IMPLICATION FOR THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS Oana MATEI Catedra de +tiinŃe Sociale i Politice, Facultatea de +tiinŃe Umaniste, Politice i Administrative, Universitatea de Vest „Vasile Goldi” din Arad Tel: 0040C257C282324 ECmail:.comei@yahooonamataABSTRACTSeveral scholars state that one of the biggest problems facing our democracies today is cynicism. Inspired from the ancient Greek philosophy, cynicism is different from the ancient kynicism. While kynicism claims a life lived according to nature, i n complete harmony of body and soul, cynicism involves a life lived in suspicions and distrust. K ynicism and cynicism both criticize the political process; both do not trust politics or political fi gures. The distinction between kynicism and cynicism is due to the fact that a cynical person rejects any kind of convention and despises what he considers to be false judgement, insisting on living his life according to nature, while cynical a person has not initially rejected social conventions and the system of values shared by society; the education process in our society makes him confused and skeptic regarding the value system shared by society and makes him notice the relativity of s ocial conventions. The way chosen by a kynic implies a life lived according to a specific ethics with specific moral laws, while the way chosen by a cynic implies a life with no morality and lack of values. Key words: enlightened consciousness,kynicism, cynicism, enlightened consciousness, fals e morality, democratic participation, democratic implication. I. KYNICISM The word cynicism as we know it comes from the Gree k word “kyon”. Kynicism as a philosophical way of thinking and living was create dby Anthistenes, a disciple of Socrates. The word comes from the name of the place where Anthist enes’ disciples used to meet, a place located somewhere near the hill of Lycabet (in Greek, meani ng “dog”/”white”/”fat”). The word “dog” reminds, also, of Diogenes from Sinope, who used to be called “the dog”, an allusion at his way of living (Diogene Laertios 1997). Without having a we ll organized scholar system, the school 5