La lecture à portée de main
Découvre YouScribe en t'inscrivant gratuitement
Je m'inscrisDécouvre YouScribe en t'inscrivant gratuitement
Je m'inscrisDescription
Sujets
Informations
Publié par | pefav |
Nombre de lectures | 7 |
Langue | English |
Extrait
DifferentialEquationswithsingularfields
Pierre-EmmanuelJabin
email:jabin@unice.fr
EquipeTosca,Inria,2004routedesLucioles,BP93,06902SophiaAntipolis
LaboratoireDieudonne´,Univ.deNice,ParcValrose,06108Nicecedex02
Abstract.
Thispaperinvestigatesthewellposednessofordinarydiffer-
entialequationsandmorepreciselytheexistence(oruniqueness)ofaflow
throughexplicitcompactnessestimates.Insteadofassumingaboundeddi-
vergenceconditiononthevectorfield,acompressibilityconditionontheflow
(boundedjacobian)isconsidered.Themainresultprovidesexistenceunder
theconditionthatthevectorfieldbelongsto
BV
indimension2and
SBV
inhigherdimensions.
1Introduction
Thisarticlestudiestheexistence(andsecondaryuniqueness)ofaflowfor
theequation
∂
t
X
(
t,x
)=
b
(
X
(
t,x
))
,X
(0
,x
)=
x.
(1.1)
Themostdirectwaytoestablishtheexistenceofsuchofflowisofcourse
throughasimpleapproximationprocedure.Thatmeanstakingaregularized
sequence
b
n
→
b
,whichenablestosolve
∂
t
X
n
(
t,x
)=
b
n
(
X
(
t,x
))
,X
n
(0
,x
)=
x,
(1.2)
bytheusualCauchy-LipschitzTheorem.Topasstothelimitin(1.2)and
obtain(1.1),itisenoughtohavecompactnessinsomestrongsense(in
L
l
1
oc
forinstance)forthesequence
X
n
.Obviouslysomeconditionsareneeded.
Firstnotethatweareinterestedinflows,whichmeansthatwearelooking
forsolutions
X
whichareinvertible:Atleast
JX
=det
d
x
X
6
=0
a.e
(with
1
d
x
X
thedifferentialof
X
in
x
only).Sothroughoutthispaper,onlyflows
x
→
X
(
t,x
)whicharenearlyincompressibleareconsidered
1≤
JX
(
t,x
)
≤
C,
∀
t
∈
[0
,T
]
,x
∈
R
d
.
(1.3)
CIfoneobtains
X
asalimitof
X
n
thenthemostsimplewayofsatisfying(1.3)
istohave
1≤
JX
n
(
t,x
)
≤
C,
∀
t
∈
[0
,T
]
,x
∈
R
d
,
(1.4)
Cforsomeconstant
C
independentof
n
.Notethatbothconditionsareonly
requiredonafiniteandgiventimeinterval[0
,T
]sinceonemayeasilyextend
X
over
R
+
bythesemi-grouprelation
X
(
t
+
T,x
)=
X
(
t,X
(
T,x
)).Usually
(1.3)and(1.4)areobtainedbyassumingaboundeddivergenceconditionon
b
or
b
n
butthisisnotthecasehere.
Itiscertainlydifficulttoguesswhatistheoptimalconditionon
b
.Itis
currentlythoughtthat
b
∈
BV
(
R
d
)isenoughor(see[12])
Bressan’scompactnessconjectur
R
e:
Let
X
n
beregular(
C
1
)solutionsto
(1.2)
,satisfying
(1.4)
andwith
sup
n
R
d
|
db
n
(
x
)
|
dx<
∞
.Thenthesequence
X
n
islocallycompactin
L
1
([0
,T
]
×
R
d
)
.
Fromthis,onewoulddirectlyobtaintheexistenceofaflowto(1.1)provided
that
b
∈
BV
(
R
d
)and(1.3)holds.InsteadofthefullBressan’sconjecture,
thisarticleessentiallyrecovers,throughadifferentmethod,theresultof[4]
namelyunderthecondition
b
∈
SBV
Theorem1.1
Assumethat
b
∈
SBV
loc
(
R
d
)
∩
L
∞
(
R
d
)
withalocallyfinite
jumpset(forthe
d
−
1
dimensionalHausdorffmeasure).Let
X
n
beregular
solutionsto
(1.2)
,satisfying
(1.4)
andsuchthat
b
n
→
b
belongsuniformlyto
L
∞
(
R
d
)
∩
W
1
,
1
(
R
d
)
.Then
X
n
islocallycompactin
L
1
([0
,T
]
×
R
d
)
.
Onlyindimension2isitpossibletobemoreprecise
Theorem1.2
Assumethat
d
≤
2
,
b
∈
BV
loc
(
R
d
)
.Let
X
n
beregularso-
lutionsto
(1.2)
,satisfying
(1.4)
andsuchthat
b
n
→
b
belongsuniformly
to
L
∞
(
R
d
)
∩
W
1
,
1
(
R
d
)
with
inf
K
b
n
∙
B>
0
foranycompact
K
andsome
B
∈
W
1
,
∞
(
R
d
,
R
d
)
.Then
X
n
islocallycompactin
L
1
([0
,T
]
×
R
d
)
.
Theproofofthefirstresultisfoundinsection7andtheproofofthesecond
insection6.Afternotationsandexamplesinsection2andtechnicallemmas
insection3,particularcasesarestudied.Insection4,averysimpleproof
2
isgivenif
b
∈
W
1
,
1
.Section5studies(1.1)indimension1forwhichcom-
pactnessholdsunderverygeneralconditions(essentiallynothingfor
b
and
amuchweakerversionof(1.3)).Thefinalsectionofferssomecommentson
theunresolvedissuesinthefull
BV
case.
Thequestionofuniquenessisdeeplyconnectedtotheexistenceandinfact
theproofofTheorem1.1maybeslightyalteredinordertoprovideit(itis
morecomplicatedforTh.1.2).Proofsarealwaysgivenforthecompactness
ofthesequencebutitisindicatedandbrieflyexplainedafterthestatedresults
whethertheycanalsogiveuniqueness;Thisisusuallythecaseexceptfor
sections5and6.
Thewellposednessof(1.1)isclassicallyobtainedbytheCauchy-Lipschitz
theorem.Thisisbasedonthesimpleestimate
|
X
(
t,x
+
δ
)
−
X
(
t,x
)
|≤|
δ
|
e
t
k
db
k
L
∞
.
(1.5)
Noticethatasimilarboundholdsif
b
isonlylog-lipschitz,leadingtothe
importantresultofuniquenessforthe2dincompressibleEulersystem(see
forinstance[28]amongmanyotherreferences).
Theideainthisarticleistoget(1.5)for
almostall
x
.Itisthereforegreatly
inspiredbytherecentapproachdevelopedin[18](seealso[17])wherethe
authorscontrolthefunctional
ZZsuplog1+
|
X
(
t,x
+
rw
)
−
X
(
t,x
)
|
dwdx.
(1.6)
R
d
rS
d
−
1
r
ThisallowsthemtogetanequivalentofTh.1.1provided
b
∈
W
1
,p
with
p>
1(andinfact
db
in
L
log
L
wouldwork).Heretheslightydifferent
functional
ZZsuplog1+
|
X
(
t,x
+
rw
)
−
X
(
t,x
)
|
dwdx,
(1.7)
r
R
d
S
d
−
1
r
isessentiallyconsidered.Itgivesabettercondition
b
∈
SBV
buthastheone
drawbackofnotimplyingstrongdifferentiabilityfortheflowatthelimit.
Othersuccessfulapproachesofcourseexistfor(1.1).Amostimportantstep
wasachievedin[22]wherethewellposednessoftheflowwasobtainedby
provinguniquenessfortheassociatedtransportequation
∂
t
u
+
b
∙r
u
=0
,
3
undertheconditionsthat
b
beofboundeddivergenceandin
W
1
,
1
.Thecru-
cialconceptthereistheoneofrenormalizedsolutions,namelyweaksolutions
u
s.t.
φ
(
u
)isalsoasolutiontothesametransportequation.Thiswasex-
tendedin[29],[27]and[26];alsosee[8]wheretheconnectionbetweenwell
posednessforthetransportequationand(1.1)isthoroughlyanalysed,both
forboundeddivergencefieldsandanequivalentto(1.3).
Usingaslightdifferentrenormalizationfortheequation
∂
t
u
+
r∙
(
bu
)=0,
thewellposednesswasfamouslyobtainedin[2]underthesamebounded
divergenceconditionand
b
∈
BV
.Thislastassumption
b
∈
BV
wasalso
consideredin[15]and[16].Stillusingrenormalizedsolutions,therestriction
ofboundeddivergencewasweakenedin[4]toanassumptionequivalentto
(1.3);Unfortunatelythisrequired
b
∈
SBV
.
Incomparisonto[4],Theorem1.1isslightyweaker(duetotheassumption
ofboundedjumpsetfor
H
d
−
1
),exceptin2
d
where(1.2)isstronger(
b
∈
BV
insteadof
SBV
).Themainadvantageoftheapproachpresentedhereisthat
weworkdirectlyonthedifferentialequation,givingforinstanceaverysimple
anddirecttheoryfor
b
∈
W
1
,
1
.Italsoprovidesquantitativeestimatesfor
|
X
(
t,x
)
−
X
(
t,x
+
δ
)
|
,whichisconnectedtotheregularityofthetrajectories.
Usuallyusingtransportequationsfor(1.1)doesnotdirectlygivesestimates
like(1.5),(1.6)or(1.7).Someinformationofthiskindcanstillbederi