THE CSR FIRM PERFORMANCE MISSING LINK

Sandra Cavaco

Description

Niveau: Supérieur
THE CSR-FIRM PERFORMANCE MISSING LINK: COMPLEMENTARITY BETWEEN ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIAL AND BUSINESS BEHAVIOR CRITERIA? Sandra CAVACO Patricia CRIFO Cahier n° 2010-19 ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE DEPARTEMENT D'ECONOMIE Route de Saclay 91128 PALAISEAU CEDEX (33) 1 69333033 mailto: ha l-0 05 04 74 7, v er si on 1 - 21 J ul 2 01 0

• dimensions such


• rating


• social responsibility


• links between


• extra-financial ratings


• strategies into multiple


• practices


• firm performance


• corporate social

Sujets

• Catholic University
• Causse Méjean
• Forget
• Lucena
• Europe
• École polytechnique

Informations

• Publié par: chaeh
• Nombre de lectures: 22
• Langue: English

Extrait

ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE
CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE

THE CSR-FIRM PERFORMANCE MISSING LINK:
COMPLEMAENNDT ABRUISTIYN EBSEST WBEEEHNA VEINOVRI RCORINTMEERINAT?A

L SOCIAL
Sandra C

AVACO
Patricia

CRIFO

Cahier n°2010-19

DEPARTEMENT D'ECONOMIE
Route de Saclay
91128 (P33A)L 1A 6IS93E3A3U0 3C3 EDEX
m
ht
a
t
il
p
t
:
o
//
:c
w
h
w
an
w
t
.
a
e
l.
c
p
o
o
n
u
o
jo
m
u
i
l
e
y
.p
@
o
p
l
o
y
l
t
y
e
t
c
e
h
c
n
h
i
n
q
i
u
q
e
u
.
e
e
.
d
ed
u/
u

TheCSR-FirmPerformanceMissingLink:
ComplementarityBetweenEnvironmental,Social
andBusinessBehaviorCriteria?
!

SandraCavaco
†
andPatriciaCrifo
‡

July9th,2010

Abstract
Thisarticleanalyzestherelationshipbetweencorporatesocialresponsi-
bility(CSR)andfirmperformancebyproposingatheoreticalmodelandby
testingempiricallyitsmainpredictionsonamatchedpaneldatabaseforthe
biggestEuropeanlistedfirmsoverthe2002-2007period.Ourdatasetgathers
twosourcesofinformation:environmental,socialandgovernance(ESG)rat-
ingsfromtheVigeodatabase,andeconomicandfinancialperformancedata
fromtheOrbisdatabase.UsingtheSystemGMMestimatorfordynamic
paneldatamodel,wetestthecomplementarityandsubstitutability,thatis
thesuper-andsub-modularitybetweenvariouscorporatesocialresponsibility
practices,alongwithitsimpactonfirmperformance.Wedoobservethata
complementaritypremiumonspecificCSRdimensions(humanresourcesand
businessbehaviortowardscustomersandsuppliers)existsbutalsothatsome
practicesarerelativesubstitutes(environmentandbusinessbehaviors).
Keywords
:Corporatesocialresponsibility,supermodularity,paneldata.
JELCodes
:M14,L21,C33.

!
WewouldliketothankKathrynShaw,PierreMohnen,EricStrobl,JosephLanfranchi,Isabelle
MejeanandVaninaForgetfortheirhelpfuladvices,andAbelLucenaforhishelpontheempirical
analysis.Wealsothankfortheirhelpfulremarksandsuggestionstheparticipantsatthefollowing
conferencesandseminars:Coinvest(Lisbon2010),CAED(Tokyo2009),ICQME(ENSAEParis
2009),NancyII,ParisII,ParisWest,CEEandE´colePolytechniqueCSR’sworkgroup.Ofcourse,
weremainresponsibleforallresidualerrorsoromissions.WearegratefultoVigeoforgranting
usaccesstotheirdata.PatriciaCrifoacknowledgesthesupportoftheChairforSustainable
FinanceandResponsibleInvestment(Toulouse-IDEIandE´colePolytechnique)andtheChairfor
BusinessEconomics(E´colePolytechnique).Accesstofinancialdata(Orbis)waspossiblethrough
theX-HEC-GISpartnership.
†
LEM,UniversityParisIIPantheon-AssasandCPP,AarhusSchoolofBusiness.
[e-mail].
‡
UniversityParisX,E´colePolytechniqueandIRES,CatholicUniversityofLouvain.patri-
[e-mail].

1

1Introduction

Thisarticleexaminesthee
!
ectsofcorporatesocialresponsibility(CSR)onfirm
performance.Aconsiderableattentionhasbeengiventothisissueforthepast
threedecades,especiallyinmanagementsciencesandorganizationaleconomics,but
noconsensushasemergedsofaronwhethercorporatesocialresponsibility(CSR)
leadsornottosuperiorperformance
1
.DoCSRstrategiesimproveperformanceor,
aretheycostlyCSRpracticesadoptedbyfirmswhereperformanceisalreadyhigh
or,wherethesepracticesaremostlikelytoimproveperformance?
Beingsociallyresponsiblemeansthat,beyondlegalconstraints,firmscommiton
avoluntarybasistobearthecostofamoreethicalbehavior(EuropeanCommis-
sion,2001).
2
Forinstance,CSRstrategiesimplytoimproveemploymentconditions
and/orbanchildlaborincountriesthatdonotrespecthumanrights,protectthe
environmentandinvestinabatementequipmenttoreducecarbonfootprint,develop
partnershipswithNGOs,orprovidefundstocharity,etc.Therefore,CSRisinher-
entlymulti-facetedanditiscrucialtounderstandwhysomebusinessesadoptthese
practiceswhileothersdonotaswellaswhichtypesofpracticesaremoreprofitable.
Thisarticlehelpsanswerthesequestionsbyinvestigatingwhichcombinations(or
clusters)ofCSRstrategiesaremostlikelytoimprovefirmperformance.
ToexaminetheimpactofclustersofCSRpracticesonfirmperformance,we
proposeatheoreticalmodelandtestitsmainpredictionsonarichdatapanelset
ofCSRandperformanceindicatorsforthebiggestEuropeanlistedfirmsduringthe
2002-2007period.
OurtheoreticalmodelformalizesCSRdecisionsasamulti-tasksagencyprob-
lemwithmoralhazardinwhichshareholdersdelegateCSRtomanagers,withthe
CSRtasksbeingevaluatedexogenouslybyanextra-financialratingagency.More
precisely,oneachCSRtask,thefirmmayreceivearatingeitheraboveorbelow
sectoralaverage.Extra-financialevaluationsareexogenousandpublicyobservedby
bothparties.TheimpactofCSRdecisionsonfirmperformancethendependson
thedegreeofcomplementaritybetweenthedi
!
erentCSRtasks.Giventheextra-
financialevaluation,twoCSRtasksarecomplementarywhenthecostofe
!
ortin
oneCSRtaskdecreaseswhenanotherCSRtaskisimplemented
3
.Weshowthat
extra-financialratingshaveapositiveimpactonCSRe
!
ortswhenatleasttwopairs
ofCSRtasksarecomplementary.WhenonlyonepairofCSRtasksiscomplemen-
tary(and/oranotheroneissubstitutable)thenCSRratingshaveanambiguous
1
ForareviewofresultsfromtheseempiricalstudiesseeMargolisandWalsh(2003)orMargolis,
ElfenbeinandWalsh(2007).
2
In2005,52%ofthetop100corporationsinthe16moreindustrializedcountriespublisheda
reportontheircorporateandsociallyresponsible(CSR)activities(Becchettietal.2005a).Inthe
U.S,1dollaroutof9investedonfinancialmarketsin2007embeddedadimensionofCSR(11%),
3%inFranceandnearly4%inEurope(EFAMA2008andEuroSIF2008).
3
Inotherwords,twoormoretasksarecomplementswhenusingonemoreintenselyincreases
themarginalbenefitofusingothersmoreintensively(seeMilgromandRoberts,1995).Inour
model,thischaracteristicsisformalizedintermsofcostcomplementarity.

2

impactonCSRe
!
ortsandfirmperformance.Hence,weshowthattheimpact
ofCSRratingsonfirmperformancedependsonthedegreeofcomplementarityor
substitutabilitybetweenthedi
!
erentCSRtasks.
ThemainpredictionsofourmodelarethentestedonamatchedCSR-Firm
performancedatabasepanelofthebiggestEuropeanlistedfirmsoverthe2002-2007
period.WeexaminewhetherCSRispositivelycorrelatedwithfirmperformance
andhowthecomplementarityorsubstitutabilitybetweentheCSRtasksa
!
ectsthis
relationship,giventheextra-financialratings.
Inourdataset,theCSRvariablesconsistinratingsattributedbytheFrench
environmentalandsocialratingagencyVigeoover3broaddomainsoffirms’cor-
poratesocialresponsibility:humanresources,environment,andbusinessbehavior
towardscustomersandsuppliers.
ThefirmperformancevariablescomefromtheOrbisdatabase(BureauVan
Dijk)andconsistindetailedinformationfromthecompanies’standardizedannual
accounts(cashflow,operatingratios,totalassets,profitabilityratiosetc.).
AsimpleanalysisontheVigeodatabaserevealsthatthedistributionofcorre-
lationamongenvironmental,humanresourcesandbusinessbehaviorratingsshows
positivecorrelationsbetweenthesedimensions.Thispatternisclearlyconsistent
withtheideathatcorporatesocialresponsibility,decomposedintoenvironmental,
socialandbusinessbehaviorfactors,wouldbecomplementaryinputsoffirmperfor-
mance.ToestimatethelinksbetweenCSRandfirmperformance,weexploitthe
dynamicdimensionofourdatasetthroughtheSystemGMM(GeneralizedMethod
ofMoments)techniqueandestimatetheimpactofCSRpracticesonfirmperfor-
mance.Thenwetestexplicitlythecomplementaritybetweenenvironmental,human
resourcesandbusinessbehaviors,anddeterminewhichpairsofpracticesarecom-
plementaryorsubstitutableinputsoffirmperformance.Wedoobservethatsome
practicesarecomplementary(humanresourcesandbusinessbehaviortowardscus-
tomersandsuppliers),butotherCSRdimensionsarealsosubstitutes(environment
andbusinessbehaviors).
Thispaperisorganizedasfollows.Section2presentsasyntheticreviewofthe
literatureonthelinksbetweenCSRandfirmperformance.Section3developsthe
theoreticalmodelanditsmaintheoreticalpredictions.Thedataandvariablesare
presentedinsection4.Theempiricalmethodologyandresultsaredevelopedin
section5.Section6concludesthearticle.

3

2BriefReviewontheCSR-FirmPerformance
kniL

ManyreasonsintheliteratureareinvokedtoexplaintheprevalenceofCSRstrate-
gies:shrinkingroleofgovernments,society’sdemandsforgreaterdisclosureand
increasedconsumers’interestinCSR,growinginvestorpressure,competitiononla-
bormarketsforcompetentandmotivatedemployees,increasingrisksassociatedwith
unethicalbehaviors,importanceoftakingintoaccountrelationshipswithsuppliers,
externalpressurefromthecivilsociety,etc.CSRstrategieswouldinfactallowfirms
tomaximizevalueandtominimizeriskinthelongruninordertorespondtoan
increasedcompetitivepressureandmarketdi
!
erentiation.Suchstrategieswould
moregenerallyallowtakingintoaccountthegrowingdemandsofthei