The Discovery of a World in the Moone - Or, A Discovrse Tending To Prove That 'Tis Probable There May Be Another Habitable World In That Planet

John Wilkins

Informations

• Publié par: nugur
• Publié le: 08 décembre 2010
• Nombre de lectures: 10
• Langue: English

Extrait

Project Gutenberg's The Discovery of a World in the Moone, by John Wilkins This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org

Title: The Discovery of a World in the Moone  Or, A Discovrse Tending To Prove That 'Tis Probable There  May Be Another Habitable World In That Planet Author: John Wilkins Release Date: August 23, 2006 [EBook #19103] Language: English Character set encoding: UTF-8 *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK WORLD IN THE MOONE ***

Produced by Louise Hope, Robert Shimmin and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net

A few typographical errors have been corrected. They have been noted in the text with mouse-hover popups. Invisible letters and punctuation have been marked without further explanation.

Words in Greek and Hebrew include mouse-hover transliterations:ὥς.

In addition to the ordinary page numbers, the printed text labeled the recto (odd) pages of the first four leaves of each 16-page signature. These will appear in the right margin as A, A2, A3...

THE DISCOVERY OF A W O IN THE MOONE.

OR, A DISCOVRSE Tending T O that ’tis probable there may be another habitable World in that Planet.

Quid tibi inquis ista proderunt? Si nihil aliud, hoc certè, sciam omnia angusta esse.S ENECA . Præf. ad 1. Lib.N. Q.

L O N Printed byE. G.forMichael Sparl andEdward Forrest, 1638.

 

D

R

O

P

L

N

 

Perlegi hæcαοξάδαρπ & novitatis graciâ typis mandari permitto. Mart. 29. 1638. T HO . W EEKES   R.P. Episc. Lond. Cap. Domest.

 

To the Reader. F amongst thy leisure houres thou canst spare any for the perusall of this discourse, and dost looke to finde somewhat in it which may serve for thy information and benefit: let me then advise thee to come unto it with an equall minde, not swayed by prejudice, but indifferently resolved to assent unto that truth which upon deliberation shall seeme most probable unto thy reason, and then I doubt not, but either thou wilt agree with mee in this assertion, or at least not thinke it to be as farre from truth, as it is from common opinion. Two cautions there are which I would willingly admonish thee of in the beginning. 1.That thou shouldst not here looke to find any exact, accurate Treatise, since this discourse was but the fruit of some lighter studies, and those too hudled up in a short time, being first thought of and finished in the s ace of some few weekes and

A3

||

casion of this di  ehttab  yht ecoIt d. s  i dmyires iew ythgdna  ilos searo a fterch a itev ecair t ts ipp  useaior mmeso,esruocsr yam I  eba g ern eeed s it musts. Sincert en ehtu nu dwonkdeidann th o her p ol ootlls s n it r me, foncesscie fo htworg eht ont untmedipeim at a yte s dncraefo hpi oonni ts, bhe ,et ah tmanosg tthe ancient vari eht htiadenrael amuler V s meee ) s ahhtse tll rp s it led.evaie (s Tim wh e, h ic str amre wod t enrrachtei  the natto be ofr vireo ru efoa  kein sut bp, unesi hcihw taht ht ich t wh thao us lbwo  ,rogithsil  tr etcrse wh, hsut a ereht  ynam er e pa hav ovessedht eci hnestnaic t ef mtoe akmeso t ,r a tah y erl teus for their disc o  fuo rga eafom  yam I noisacco isthy  bIf y.erov tmo taet  onaret readany oke prov  nehnihtahs t llurat Ie,thf  nis

||

fe

||

ke m sel u op dnotane nebncip pri as les, rfa eb ot e fo diaintaernty ang inhtni ghttam yas eeme to contradicht t .meu nAliwnnglissnetoe ak t  intings ch th e su ,ni taoimani oxe eseho tofe ons  ninrael fo sruorr se timesg in the dybt eho sbreev Ve us laru ud jioic lnoiesseQ .mtseu uodl ths ah i t,tt  hed,olisso p be  tonnac uoy erofeecxp eonasren  i  rht eeluqri,eo  the Auth isure of ,spaeht  sa hrep ulwored bjsut ec        htre trutthe  each ofec ,dnnaah trot  asmee  by  bedurnemugra h dluohs t  every consequenc  ton tolko ehtta unn nideleab pede hs edluo eb a fo  fhtefo rpooht efor nts gume le ar sum uoy erofereh d t an, onnipi ois T  oerem eni .t .2  have door might rp ybabo esilenoI t omprermbha t meht tes W :enwod  if, chhi gbet  ide( artnt ihsaI it mnke  then ust)  ta t si,sihaht prt abob tlyy heam yos ebs loev,d as I have here  d o veol sbey blsi eh neht esiwreht Butare.hey re t iaem gnI t iht eh tysiI .  s n it esecs ta emonarght ticall app Astronom m yap soaearcnse edshth,  sate omw ti ereb otiw elaid downe, and  ihhcI h va eeherseass hi wn,iorted ylremt dednef ote,er ne for  havo  fehsrebttht elihPposoicna tne . M ed y an e  bovprtai  sot t ihgn ht he maineion in ttcafsitas emos din fllwi eradret reneidff eni tht, bu notoubt I d a f laesc noecti, for us to think ruoyiap  sen dnaseobatrvn.iois T nieduof  yrtm na weluthsrthyl wo  yb detc y ,srehto thn  iet yay mem r a long have fonen geelt mi eil ioin, nsole opd hguo yeht cihwht h e exa o th untours htseo  fitnoiman e or mldou wus of vaedne ruo ylppa

      ewer.ll lufe aF .l,ya dnt       ahpp successhis work 1

3

B

2

The First Proposition, by way of Preface. That the strangenesse of this opinion is no sufficient reason why it should be rejected, because other certaine truths have beene formerly esteemed ridiculous, and great absurdities entertayned by common consent.

Here is an earnestnesse and hungering after novelty, which doth still adhere unto all our natures, and it is part of that primative image, that wide extent and infinite capacity at first created in the heart of man, for this since its depravation inAdamperceiving it selfe altogether emptied of any good doth now catch after every new thing, conceiving that possibly it may finde satisfaction among some of its fellow creatures. But our enemy the divell (who strives still to pervert our gifts, and beate us with our owne weapons) hath so contriv’d it, that any truth doth now seeme distastefull for that very reason, for which errour is entertain’d—Novelty, for let but some upstart heresie be set abroach, and presently there are some out of a curious humour; others, as if they watched an occasion of singularity, will take it up for canonicall, and make it part of their creede and profession; whereas solitary truth cannot any where finde so ready entertainement; but the same Novelty which is esteemed the commendation of errour and makes that acceptable, is counted the fault of truth, and causes that to bee rejected. How did the incredulous World gaze atloCumbuswhen hee promised to discover another part of the earth, and he could not for a long time by his confidence, or arguments, induce any of the Christian Princes, either to assent unto his opinion, or goe to the charges of an experiment. Now if he who had such good grounds for his assertion, could finde no better entertainement among the wiser sort, and upper end of the World; ’tis not likely then that this o inion which I now deliver, shall receive an thin

B2

contradiction to ht eegenarllc no sot uc msth ngrasene ,esm os hcu  opithis seenionotc em s nii  rayror ew fby  ee;on nllaiceps ecnis y  tsin to whttai mon opin the com uocsegarna eid y  Iceno k ntme in , s ah tdet osvl ma erot bll n shathis  .srehto fo tnesI , erevw hot Bu tego rehr sacidi lyerst emeee lt d a h va eebne eofmr , 1. Other truths rt eht mroF .htuet dore ro fctra nie taca ddhtre of oion s tha ther t ha Isoac e th,cnatfo ena esni hall giv nion. I s arllo ip  dyb egen neairtteene enbe evah seitidrusbse aGros . 2.  n be sact ih ssaluuo f  oontiatwhmeso as ehT ”. ohtua emth ar doin also rep onhta ccalec  Pinlohiphso ty, taha osretfdraw they may bee famdef rot ehi vnne itluts sudarg siscnei  sel væ,tisa t ,d ciuqdiai s e rele d velamen arogfo sA esu axan tor sheol f flyoi,nE tsma eponin ignobil  enim no yl ,f loylt obdlst k wors ofinde hto ro enehw ,remeirff o aid sne o na cev llial mapbus propositis h siT’non fo eeht  emrt abstiril “e. deri be t toxpec eh e nylt uitsam y d veieel bbeo  tdna ,tsom yb ded say.” If   what to  onswn toa m nak  ’durI , s hunsceew nt ersehtem e t, 4 urdisot  iedntou cussba na elbirroh 

Mytholog. lib. 3. c. 17.

6

5

B3

Lib. 7. c. 1.

et br p teay mhe t R ehedaeapert ersider thr to conohtua  rp nisgw ti hen he we,icudejtaht ees llahs e ppos mon o  com the  thtiasn ngatioiw sihciha I riff cmenoanant way  d y regota erfmoi ts truth. 1. Otheshturt reb evah rmfoe encc alyerdea uotn cilur s dias tous  I shis, enAitoptao  fhtcifie thhall spe  dei dnaeneened hah  bve s,de icwh  drg nna es em  yiw mant byht alaug oreH erew sa hcu ss,erllhoSct ea , Lactantius, th odut,sS .t uAtsniLu, etcrs iue P theV earen elbedeB the and minovoluP oreo,tsu ,ocip s.erth h ootoder H elubA sutiw sisn may i t I  y exustlt  oeptcccsueba  fie tht veint rsfo srotnaht oS . uth which they thmeesvlsew re eon nol alt w loy an wennihtof grt r so e nhw ,eminno  wilride ous p envi ot meht seit ess pi oryrantcoe th o htre sceet dybrversenewhose pe suaco se fo  eht nd aei rhi f ts,ng  era tahtnarongibyd deri tseho t hp,yoloseb ed t  oruthew t Phis inpahnenip essn fo iewabes e ene u thisno .tIh ta hlasbeliefe or derimit bu s,it warlguv ruo yllaicepss, edaieese f thneo ehm mot     rf        ig m shtmeeeo k  t  wonhton,gniliw l bring up monstorsua sbruiditse ini res esorntve a essiuftnaerapp ome  . “ Se arther oel ehwhtyesa t uqilon autnaa ,r in ra hi P  mvaston i tnorudoloshpãi alicujucunt, ut o sih siht dna ,thh itsa, onnipi enn ll inoun su N , videsse  sciihil .sF roN talaseC nsure from other tahtihP osolrehp esompe sinakofg  oth id tssresia  adde to   cresomeht epacs ec ekil eou conti eot nld nophanes pinion Xe  rhtsio iscn eof s waleaborthy itsohwua e a , nam ce, a oran igncallamitrpga f adeo  y lliaecsp en,iotatnetso dlob dn