shortsale auditx

Administrator

Description

Forensic Loan Audit Loan Number: Current Servicer: John Doe and Jane DoeAddress Rateswire.com Predatory Loan Test Grade: FAILDisclaimer: Rateswire.com is not a law firm and this audit is not to be construed as legal advice. Rateswire.com makes no guarantee of any kind as to the usefulness or accuracy of results in this audit. Rateswire.com assumes no liability whatsoever for any incorrect findings in this audit. Rateswire.com Predatory Loan Test is an opinion of the auditor of the amount and degree of predatory lending acts apparent within oral and written documentation provided, with PASS exhibiting little to no predatory acts, and FAIL exhibiting the multiple or severe predatory lending acts. © Page 1 It is always the opinion of Rateswire.com thaat you s seek legal counsel for any legal questions and/oor legal problems arising in your loan. Parties Involved in Transaction (not comprehensive) “Borrower”: John Doe “Co-borrowerr”: Jane Doe “Borrowers”: John Doe and Jane Doe “Lender”: X Mortgage“Servicer”: X Servicing Company “Mortgage Broker”: N/A“Appraiser”: X Appraiser“Real Estate Agent”: N/A“Title Company”: X Title “Escrow Company”: X Escrow “Title and Esccrow”: X Title and XX Escroww “Seller”: Parents X and Y of John Doe © Page 2 General Description of Events: Seller wanted to sell their property to their son and his wife, borrowers. Multiple lending companies prudently turned down application for ...

Informations

• Publié par: Enyo
• Nombre de lectures: 248
• Langue: English

Extrait

©

Disclaim

as legal

usefuln

whatsoe

Test is a

acts app

exhibiti

predato

Rat

mer: Ratesw

advice. Ra

ess or accu

ever for an

an opinion

parent wit

ng little to

ory lending

Jo

eswire.c

wire.com i

ateswire.co

uracy of re

ny incorrec

of the aud

hin oral an

o no predat

g acts.

Forensi

Loan

Curren

ohn Doe

A

com Pre

FA

s not a law

om makes

esults in th

ct findings

ditor of the

nd written

tory acts, a

ic Loan A

n Numbe

nt Servic

e and Jan

ddress

datory L

AI

w firm and

no guaran

is audit. Ra

in this aud

e amount a

document

and FAIL ex

Audit

er:

cer:

ne Doe

Loan Tes

L

this audit

ntee of any

ateswire.co

dit. Ratesw

and degree

tation prov

xhibiting th

st Grade

is not to b

y kind as to

om assum

wire.com P

e of preda

vided, with

he multiple

P

e:

be construe

o the

es no liabi

Predatory L

tory lendin

h PASS

e or severe

Page 1

ed

lity

Loan

ng

e

©

It is al

couns

in you

P

“Borro

“Co-b

“Borro

“Lend

“Servi

“Mort

“Appr

“Real

“Title

“Escro

“Title

“Selle

lways th

sel for an

ur loan.

Parties I

ower”:

orrower

owers”:

der”:

icer”:

tgage Br

raiser”:

Estate A

Compan

ow Com

and Esc

er”:

he opinio

ny legal

nvolved

r”:

roker”:

Agent”:

ny”:

pany”:

crow”:

on of Ra

questio

d in Tran

John

Jane

John

X Mo

X Ser

N/A

X Ap

N/A

X Tit

X Esc

X Tit

Pare

teswire

ns and/o

nsaction

Doe

Doe

Doe an

ortgage

rvicing C

praiser

le

crow

le and X

nts X an

.com tha

or legal

(not com

d Jane D

Company

X Escrow

nd Y of Jo

at you s

problem

mprehe

Doe

y

ohn Doe

P

seek lega

ms arisin

nsive)

e

Page 2

al

ng

©

Gener

Seller

borrow

down

Lende

progra

Lende

Loan s

to Inc

Borro

repay

Servic

engag

modif

Borro

paying

Servic

borrow

that t

Makin

Servic

plan.

ral Descr

wanted

wers. M

applica

er agreed

am.

er made

subsequ

ome Rat

wers en

ment ag

cer told b

gement a

fication.

wers ca

g as agre

cer bega

wers Ma

heir loan

ng Home

cer refus

ription o

d to sell

ultiple l

tion for

d to mak

the loan

uently w

tio (DTI)

ngaged L

greemen

borrowe

and app

nceled t

eed.

n forecl

aking Ho

n owner

e Afford

sed to al

of Event

their pro

lending

borrow

ke loan

n while u

ent into

).

Lender/S

nt.

ers mult

ply for a

their rep

osure on

ome Affo

r never g

able loa

llow bor

s:

operty t

compan

ers to p

on a bus

unlicens

o default

Servicer

tiple tim

Making

payment

n borrow

ordable

gave the

an modif

rrowers

to their s

nies prud

urchase

siness ba

sed to do

t due to

to cure

es to ca

Home A

t plan th

wers, an

loan mo

em auth

fication.

to resta

son and

dently tu

e home.

ank stat

o so.

an exce

default

ncel rep

Affordab

hat they

nd denie

odificati

orizatio

art repay

P

his wife

urned

tement

essive De

through

payment

ble loan

had bee

ed

ion stati

n to do

yment

Page 3

e,

ebt

h a

t

en

ing

a

©

Preda

1)

U

m

s

d

in

c

2)

(

b

in

B

L

s

d

b

f

b

c

m

3)

F

le

p

d

f

o

atory Act

Unlicens

mortgage

seen in h

damaged

nterest c

charge.

Negligen

borrowe

ncome a

Borrowe

Lender’s

should h

default r

business

or insolv

borrowe

credit an

misrepre

Fraud. L

egally at

property

descripti

raudule

or seen b

ts and D

ed Activ

e loans

hyperlink

d by an a

charged

nt) Misr

r’s busin

and that

er was an

represe

ave kno

rate at th

bank st

vent, rec

rs. Borro

nd forecl

esentatio

ender k

ttach a l

y in state

on acco

ntly add

by borro

amages

vity. Len

in the st

k: www.

amount

d, which

epresen

ness ban

t borrow

n unsop

entation

own, but

he time,

tatemen

cently b

ower ap

losure re

on.

new it w

egal des

e. Lende

ordingly.

ded lega

ower. Bo

s to Borr

der’s wa

tate. The

.fakeurl

equal to

lender w

ntation.

nk statem

wer could

histicate

, which

t as evid

, Lender

nts shoul

ankrupt

ppears to

elated d

was unlic

scription

er attach

Lender

l descrip

orrower

rower

as not a

e expire

.com . B

o all cos

was nev

Lender r

ments s

d afford

ed borro

appears

enced b

did not

ld not be

t, and fir

o be suff

amaged

censed a

n to mor

hed a bla

is forec

ption no

appears

uthorize

d license

Borrowe

sts and o

ver licens

represen

hould be

paymen

ower and

s false. L

by Lende

t know t

e used a

rst time

fering o

d due to

and cou

rtgage su

ank lega

losing o

ot ackno

s to be s

P

ed to ma

e can be

r appea

ongoing

sed to

nted tha

e used a

nt.

d relied

Lender

er’s 60%

hat

as incom

home

ngoing

Lender’

ld not

ubject

l

n a

wledged

suffering

Page 4

ake

e

rs

at

as

on

+

e

’s

d

g

©

o

f

S

4)

E

b

c

u

t

le

s

b

a

a

b

a

h

w

t

d

im

m

a

L

B

ongoing

oreclosu

See attac

Excessive

borrowe

contract)

underwr

imes tha

enders i

specifica

bank sta

above th

adjustme

business

a special

have bee

was inso

hrough

destructi

mpendin

mortgage

appears

Lender’s

Borrowe

credit a

ure proc

ched De

e DTI (fa

r to eve

). Lende

riting is e

at of the

n the fie

lly show

tement

he 43% F

ents in e

bank st

unsoph

en given

olvent, fi

bankrup

ion of cr

ng loss o

e they s

to be su

lack of

er could

nd forec

ceedings

eds of T

ailure to

r receive

er’s gene

evidence

e 1% def

eld. Lend

wn in tha

loan at

FHA stan

excess o

tatemen

histicate

a loan a

rst time

ptcy. Bo

redit, im

of family

hould n

uffering f

care and

not affo

closure r

s on a fra

Trust as E

use rea

e benefi

eral lack

ed by a d

fault rate

der’s lac

at Lende

a debt t

ndard lim

f 50% of

nts, befo

d and fr

at such a

e homeb

rrowers

pending

y home d

ot have

from a f

d provid

ord.

related d

audulen

Exhibit A

sonable

its or ful

of reaso

default r

e for oth

ck of rea

er appro

to incom

mit. The

f borrow

ore taxes

ragile cla

a high D

buyers, a

s appear

g loss of

due to o

been gr

foreclosu

ding a mo

damage

nt Deed o

A.

e care)(in

lfill mor

onable c

rate ove

her prof

asonable

ved a bu

e ratio

loan ha

wer’s inc

s. Borrow

ass that

TI, as bo

and rece

r damage

f equity,

obtaining

ranted. B

ure due

ortgage

P

es from t

of Trust.

nability

tgage

care in

er sixty

fessiona

e care is

usiness

(DTI)

d payme

come on

wer was

should n

orrower

ently we

ed by

and

g a

Borrowe

to

that

Page 5

the

.

for

l

ent

s of

not

r

nt

er

©

5)

B

b

c

m

A

c

c

a

a

a

6)

(

in

S

n

B

s

S

M

a

Breach o

borrowe

cancel th

mortgage

Affordab

currently

credit da

and indu

agreeme

agreeme

Negligen

nstructe

Servicer

not appr

Borrowe

statemen

See servi

Making H

authoriza

of Contra

r on mu

he repay

e in orde

ble loan

y sufferi

amages d

ucement

ent) cont

ent and p

nt) Misr

ed borro

was in a

roved by

er was da

nt to can

icer’s sta

Home Af

ation as

act. Serv

ultiple da

yment pl

er to ap

modifica

ng from

due to fo

t to brea

tract. Se

paymen

epresen

ower to b

a positio

y investo

amaged

ncel his

atement

ffordabl

Exhibit

vicer spe

ates, inc

lan and

ply obta

ation ins

foreclo

ollowing

ach the m

ee borrow

ts on sa

ntation.

breach c

on to kno

ors for M

for rely

repaym

t that lo

le due to

C.

ecifically

cluding A

stop pay

ain a Ma

stead. B

sure pro

g Service

mortgag

wers rep

me as E

Servicer

contract

ow borro

aking H

ying on S

ent plan

an was

o a lack

y instruc

August 1

yment o

aking Ho

Borrowe

oceeding

er’s inst

ge (repay

paymen

xhibit B

r specific

with Le

ower’s l

Home Af

Servicers

n as abo

not eligi

of inves

P

ted

12, 2008

on the

ome

r is

gs and

ruction

yment

nt

.

cally

ender.

oan was

ffordable

s false

ve in 5.

ible for

stor

Page 6

to

s

e.

©

Notes

The cat

significa

of the p

s and Dis

egories ab

ant in any o

predatory a

sclaimer

ove repres

other way

acts above

rs:

sent audito

. Please co

.

or’s opinio

onsult your

on of what

r lawyer as

happened

s to the leg

P

d and are n

gal significa

Page 7

not

ance