OAG08-Audit Group 2

Kruss

Description

Hay Group Insight2008 Employee Survey EOffice of the Auditor General of CanadaOrganization Group: Audit Group 2June, 2008© 2008 Hay Group Limited. All Rights ReservedTable of ContentsHay Group InsightPageI. Overview of ResultsResponse RateProfile ChartsII. Detailed Results Overall Rating 1Perceived Impact of Work 2Vision and Direction of the Office 3Office Values 5Personal Values 7Management of the Office 8© 2008 Hay Group Limited. All Rights Reserved1 OAG 2008 EMPLOYEE SURVEYTable of ContentsHay Group InsightPageII. Detailed Results (continued)Organizational Intentions 10Work Unit 11Supervision 14Monetary & Non-Monetary Incentives 18Career Management 22Career Progress 24Promotion Process 28Resource allocation 29Pressures at work 30Stress 32© 2008 Hay Group Limited. All Rights Reserved2 OAG 2008 EMPLOYEE SURVEYTable of ContentsHay Group InsightPage II. Detailed Results (continued)Work/Life Balance 32Work Arrangements 33Work Environment 34Harassment 35Discrimination 36Respectful Workplace 37Language of Work 38Official Languages 39Language Training 41Departures 43Concluding Impressions 44© 2008 Hay Group Limited. All Rights Reserved3 OAG 2008 EMPLOYEE SURVEYI. Overview of ResultsHay Group InsightResponse RateNumber of Percentage of Number of Number ofRespondents Respondents Respondents Respondents2008 2008 2006 2004___________________________________________________________Total OAG 555 ...

Sujets

• management

Informations

• Publié par: Unya
• Nombre de lectures: 14
• Langue: English

Extrait

Hay GroupInsight

2008Employee Survey Officeof the Auditor General of Canada

Organization Group: Audit Group 2

© 2008 Hay Group Limited. All Rights Reserved

June, 2008

I. O

Response Rate Profile Charts

Hay GroupInsight

Table of Contents

1 2 3 5 7 8

Page

II. Detailed Results Overall Rating Perceived Impact of Work Vision and Direction of the Office Office Values Personal Values Management of the Office

002©yaH8orG1iRhgstRsereev O dupLimited.All YEVRUS8002AGEEOYPLEM ivwevreeRusofstl

iLpuorGyaH8002htigRllAd.temi2© YE de AOG02 seResvr YEESURV08EMPLO

Page

II. Detailed Results (continued) Organizational Intentions Work Unit Supervision Monetary & Non-Monetary Incentives Career Management Career Progress Promotion Process Resource allocation Pressures at work Stress

10 11 14 18 22 24 28 29 30 32

Table of Contents

Hay GroupInsight

puLGorH8ya2©00ghRilAl.editim 2GAO devreseRst3 008MELPYOEESRUVEY

Page

Table of Contents

II. Detailed Results (continued) Work/Life Balance Work Arrangements Work Environment Harassment Discrimination Respectful Workplace Language of Work Official Languages Language Training Departures Concluding Impressions

32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 41 43 44

Hay GroupInsight

muN 08EMPLO ed OAG20YEEYEUSVR Ad.temiLipouGrvreseRsthgiRll4aHy0280© 2 stn 2800280026004 _ 00 ____________ opdnnesteRpsnoedntsResponde rebmuN onspRe of essRntde feborcrneePofNtagerofumbe ______________________________________________

27

34 113%

450

36

I. Overview of Results

Audit Group 2 - Watters

Total OAG

Response Rate

Hay GroupInsight

555 93%

545

ations.organizfoohtreerustlsedernicrestluoitsasnehTeuq lemiddThe rs. ƒ caotrofpusg 7 or fomorNayHhetsetacidnienil0 USVRYEG2008EMPLOYEE gniwevoeivrhcwƒTfhelooltsoiq8euahtsntsumartsze2mari derapmocehtot dbencaytlecir vafaruoopsedednanAGthdyblOinlaHy ad evorela ofNorthtabankinagronaciremA hacheƒT s.ontiza evarnaaraetrseronumbfageo thrgatuprofometi Tƒ .s pehttoledresultsindictaehteidffrenercpe(cevidetenb)noitatneewte erce he peofntagoleyepmohrsew mpcolcaritoish6002ƒ .tnemeganaMeerCarctorefarhtnofirosmoap teeawid bld tr erotcuohsnoisafsgImpresoncludinrotehCrasinof tfosnoc,sdner lalerov ticadiin erphwlinigvodiestifquandons ontsihcirocla tiess.on heƒTisre sotsepicifcuqanmaskresponse pmelniocbemya

Hay GroupInsight

Profiled Factors

te.eliforpeht suh psougreesthrfo askenot200din ros .6 Fƒrguomoe tiaucthqusaon1noitsesaw4-0 tatoplotallsruevyaftcro,st,pserthmaebeysniiffuneicadt ightsReserved OA piLimet.dAllR©0820yHaouGr5

USVRYEMPLOYEEG2008E .dAllRpiLimetserved OA ightsRe6yHaouGr©0820

OAG 2008

OAG 2006

-30

Stress

30

Career Management

Monetary & Non- Monetary Incentives  Resource allocation

Concluding Impressions

0

10

20

Overall Results - Total OAG

-20

-10

OAG 2004

Supervision

Hay GroupInsight Vision & Direction of Office

20

10

0

Concluding Impressions

2008

-30

2004

2006

Hay GroupInsight Vision & Direction of Office

Organization Group: Audit Group 2

Supervision

Monetary & Non- Monetary Incentives

Career Management

Resource allocation

Stress

30

-20

-10

EEYOLPMYEVRUS ©8002yHaouGrLiptemi.dAllRgithseRserved OAG2008E 7

HayGroup

Percent of Respondents Diff Diff Diff Diff About the same It's Not as Good Now  Pub fromfrom from 2006 2004 Sec Norm

100%+11 +25 +40 +36

Q. 1a2 How would you rate the Office as a place to work now, compared with two years ago?

Total Office of the Auditor 554 General (OAG) Audit Group 2Mark Watters 34

88%11% 1% +6 +18 +28 +24

Percent of Respondents Diff Diff Diff Diff N from from Pub from Group Valid  AverageAboveAverage Average Below  Norm2006 2004 Sec

Q. 1a1 Overall, how would you rate the Office as an organization to work for?

Organization Group 1a-Overall Rating

+2 +7 - +19

46%

38%

Total Office of the Auditor 432 General (OAG) Audit Group 2Mark Watters 26

Group Valid N

56%

It's Better Now

6% -8 +4 - +3

Page 1

54%

OAG 2008 Employee Survey June, 2008

ttersMarkWaltsufosReorG2puA:rtidu

2pouGratWrkMarofstlutiduA:etsrseR

91%

8% 1% +7 +4 - -

Q. 1b1 How would you rate your current satisfaction with the following? Being part of an organization that contributes to the public good Percent of Respondents Diff Diff Diff Diff GroupValid N  Not NeutralVery Satisfied at all Satisfied f 6002 morf rm m oN for S  ce Pub 2004 rom

Organization Group 1b-Perceived Impact of work

19% 6% +16 +22 -2 -9

94%

Q. 1b2 How would you rate your current satisfaction with the following? Being part of an organization where I can clearly perceive the effectiveness of my work Percent of Respondents Diff Diff Diff Diff GroupValid N Very Satisfied at all Satisfied Neutral Not from from Pub from 2006 2004 Sec Norm

Total Office of the Auditor 548 General (OAG) Audit Group 2Mark Watters 33

HayGroup

3% 3% +5 +2 - -

20% 6% +7 +21 -3 -10

75%

Total Office of the Auditor 547 General (OAG) Audit Group 2Mark Watters 34

Page 2

74%

OAG 2008 Employee Survey June, 2008

19% 8% +2 +11 - -

Diff Diff Diff Diff Tend to Disagree  Pub fromfrom from 2006 2004 Sec Norm

Diff Diff Diff Diff a e from Tend to Dis gre f cemroN P S bu 02 m 40 rofmro 0620

6% 1% +3 +9 - -

+7 +11 - -

OAG 2008 Employee Survey June, 2008

15% 3% +4 +13 - -

3% +4 +11 - +38

6% 1% +2 +9 - +34

Diff Diff Diff Diff Tend t Di from o sagree 2  00 rfmorf 6004 om 2 Pub orNcSem

93%

97%

Total Office of the Auditor 554 General (OAG) Audit Group 2Mark Watters 34

Percent of Respondents Neither Agree nor Disagree

HayGroup

Total Office of the Auditor 553 General (OAG) Audit Group 2Mark Watters 34

Page 3

100%

Organization Group 1c-Vision and Direction of the Office

Q. 1c1 How strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statement? I understand where the Office is going over the next two years Percent of Respondents GroupValid N Tend to Agree Agree nor Neither Disagree

73%

Total Office of the Auditor 551 General (OAG) Audit Group 2Mark Watters 34

Q. 1c2 How strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statement? I have a good understanding of the vision and values of the Office Percent of Respondents GroupValid N Tend to Agree Neither Agree nor Disagree

82%

93%

Q. 1c3 How strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statement? I support the vision and values of the Office Group Valid N Tend to Agree

ttWaserM2karGtipuor:rofduAltsResu