Comment Report
7 pages
English
Le téléchargement nécessite un accès à la bibliothèque YouScribe
Tout savoir sur nos offres
7 pages
English
Le téléchargement nécessite un accès à la bibliothèque YouScribe
Tout savoir sur nos offres

Description

Errata802.5w/d1: Full Comment ReportComment NAJ 01Section .3 Line 142 Severity A/C Type ED Status MODIFIEDHighlight To Committee Commenter Agrees? Editing CompleteNot enough detail. See section 4/line 281 for the Amd. 1 equivalent.Concern:New text:Solution:None. Corrects the detection of a condition requiring the priority STACK to be optionally cleared in the ISO/IEC 8802 5:1198/Amd. 1:1998 standard (all known implementations handle this condition correctly).Accept in principle. However section 3 deals with changes to 802.5:1998 so I Response:have removed the reference to Amd.1 (and added a few centuries).New text:None. Corrects the detection of a condition requiring the priority STACK to be optionally cleared in the ISO/IEC 8802 5:1998 standard (all known implementations handle this condition correctly).Rebuttal:Comment KR 01Section 0.0 Line 76 Severity A/C Type ED Status ACCEPTEDHighlight To Committee Commenter Agrees? Editing CompleteIf the blank page between the table of contents and the Overview is in fact a Concern:blank page and not a formatting snafu then it needs to be identified as such.If a blank page, add "This page intentionally left blank."Solution:formatting problem, please correct it.This will be addressed when the document is migrated to Framemaker prior to Response:publication.Rebuttal:Comment MJH-01Section 4.0 Line 382 Severity A/C Type ED Status MODIFIEDHighlight To Committee Commenter Agrees? Editing ...

Sujets

Informations

Publié par
Nombre de lectures 17
Langue English

Exrait

802.5w/d1: Full Comment Report
Errata
Comment
NAJ-01
Section
.3
Line
142
Severity
A/C
Type
ED
Concern:
Not enough detail.
See section 4/line 281 for the Amd. 1 equivalent.
Solution:
New text:
None.
Corrects the detection of a condition requiring the priority STACK to
be optionally cleared in the ISO/IEC 8802-5:1198/Amd. 1:1998 standard (all
known implementations handle this condition correctly).
Response:
Accept in principle.
However section 3 deals with changes to 802.5:1998 so I
have removed the reference to Amd.1 (and added a few centuries).
New text:
None.
Corrects the detection of a condition requiring the priority STACK to
be optionally cleared in the ISO/IEC 8802-5:1998 standard (all known
implementations handle this condition correctly).
Status
MODIFIED
Commenter Agrees?
Editing Complete
Highlight To Committee
Rebuttal:
Comment
KR-01
Section
0.0
Line
76
Severity
A/C
Type
ED
Concern:
If the blank page between the table of contents and the Overview is in fact a
blank page and not a formatting snafu then it needs to be identified as such.
Solution:
If a blank page, add "This page intentionally left blank."
If a formatting problem, please correct it.
Response:
This will be addressed when the document is migrated to Framemaker prior to
publication.
Status
ACCEPTED
Commenter Agrees?
Editing Complete
Highlight To Committee
Rebuttal:
Comment
MJH-01
Section
4.0
Line
382
Severity
A/C
Type
ED
Concern:
The change to REF 3206, adds the text 'FSMR<2' to the Event column, without
the change indication.
Solution:
Remove 'FSMR<2'
Response:
Good catch.
Remove "FSMR<2 & ".
Status
MODIFIED
Commenter Agrees?
Editing Complete
Highlight To Committee
Rebuttal:
Page 1 of 5
21-Jan-99
802.5/99/01-05r1
Comment
MJH-02
Section
4.0
Line
398
Severity
A/C
Type
ED
Concern:
References 1203 and 1210 have had the 'S/T' field captalized (can't have a
York meeting without a long discussion on captialization).
Solution:
Leave them as they were,
ie 'TEDa' and 'TEDb' or change them all. (1208 ,
1204, 1205, and new TEDH on 1209) and all the TDEx). If changed ensure changed
is underlined.
Response:
Background: Other clauses seem to use all caps for alternatives.
Figure M.3
in W/d1 has been changed to use all caps where before it said TEDa.
802.5w seems to have been based on changes from 802.5t in practice.
This has
caused difficulties such as the one outlined in this comment.
The committee
feels that the document should be based on changes from 802.5 and Amd.1
instead.
The irrelevant editorial changes will be removed.
Status
MODIFIED
Commenter Agrees?
Editing Complete
Highlight To Committee
Rebuttal:
Comment
MJH-03
Section
4.0
Line
398
Severity
A/C
Type
ED
Concern:
'S/T' 'TEDH' added to ref 1209, without underline
Solution:
Indicate 'S/T' has been changed.
Response:
Avoid the change.
See MJH-02.
Status
MODIFIED
Commenter Agrees?
Editing Complete
Highlight To Committee
Rebuttal:
Comment
EDTR-17
Section
4.0
Line
398
Severity
DIS
Type
ED
Concern:
Transition 1209 is missing a S/T column entry.
Ref 1205 has the wrong S/T
entry.
Solution:
Suggest: Add next free "TED?" reference as the S/T column entry for ref 1209.
Change 1205's S/T entry back to "TEDe".
Editor to sort out the details.
Try to avoid clashes with 802.5t.
Response:
Status
ACCEPTED
Commenter Agrees?
Editing Complete
Highlight To Committee
Rebuttal:
Comment
MJH-04
Section
4.0
Line
398
Severity
A/C
Type
ED
Concern:
'S/T' for 1205 has been changed from 'TEDe' to 'TEDH'
Solution:
Indicate 'S/T' has been changed.
Response:
See MJH-02.
Status
MODIFIED
Commenter Agrees?
Editing Complete
Highlight To Committee
Rebuttal:
Page 2 of 5
21-Jan-99
802.5/99/01-05r1
Comment
MJH-06
Section
4.0
Line
398
Severity
A/C
Type
ED
Concern:
Comment on ref 1209 has been changed without being underlined.
Solution:
Indicate comment changed
Response:
See MJH-02.
Status
MODIFIED
Commenter Agrees?
Editing Complete
Highlight To Committee
Rebuttal:
Comment
MJH-05
Section
4.0
Line
398
Severity
A/C
Type
ED
Concern:
Comment on action for ref 1210 has been changed, without being underlined.
Solution:
Indicate comment changed
Response:
See MJH-02.
Status
MODIFIED
Commenter Agrees?
Editing Complete
Highlight To Committee
Rebuttal:
Comment
MJH-07
Section
4.0
Line
400
Severity
A/C
Type
ED
Concern:
The event for ref 1606 has had a non-indicated change of
CSLE<255.
Solution:
Change CSLE to CPLE and do not indicate a change.
Response:
Correct.
Status
ACCEPTED
Commenter Agrees?
Editing Complete
Highlight To Committee
Rebuttal:
Comment
MJH-08
Section
4.0
Line
424
Severity
A/C
Type
ED
Concern:
'S/T''s TDEb, TDEa, TEDa, TEDb, TEDc, TEDd have been capitalized without a
change indication. TEDe has been deleted without a change indication. TEDH has
been added without a change indication.
Solution:
Make diagram consistent with actual table and indicate ALL changes.
Response:
Accept, in that the irrelevant changes will be undone.
Status
ACCEPTED
Commenter Agrees?
Editing Complete
Highlight To Committee
Rebuttal:
Comment
NAJ-02
Section
A..7
Line
165
Severity
DIS
Type
ED
Concern:
Table A.7.3.4
<<TBD>> reference should be fixed.
Solution:
Should be 8.3
Response:
Done.
Status
ACCEPTED
Commenter Agrees?
Editing Complete
Highlight To Committee
Rebuttal:
Page 3 of 5
21-Jan-99
802.5/99/01-05r1
Comment
NAJ-03
Section
A..7
Line
167
Severity
DIS
Type
ED
Concern:
Table A.7.3.5
<<TBD>> reference should be fixed.
Solution:
Should be 8.3.1
Response:
Done.
Status
ACCEPTED
Commenter Agrees?
Editing Complete
Highlight To Committee
Rebuttal:
Comment
NAJ-04
Section
A..7
Line
169
Severity
DIS
Type
ED
Concern:
Table A.7.3.6
<<TBD>> reference should be fixed.
Solution:
Should be 13.7.2.2
Response:
Done.
Status
ACCEPTED
Commenter Agrees?
Editing Complete
Highlight To Committee
Rebuttal:
Comment
MJH-09
Section
A.5
Line
106
Severity
Q
Type
TECH
Concern:
Was the 'Status' for *DTRS and *DTRP in the ISO 8802-5 Amd 1 document,
incorrect?
Solution:
Response:
Yes.
The entries you refer to allowed you state that an implementation was
both a station and a C-Port.
This is not possible within the standard.
However if you are a C-Port, you can be in station emulation mode.
But that's
not the same as being a station.
Status
ANSWERED
Commenter Agrees?
Editing Complete
Highlight To Committee
Rebuttal:
Comment
MJH-11
Section
A.6
Line
112
Severity
A/C
Type
ED
Concern:
This 'Item' has been renamed 'TRM'. I believe Txxx convention was used for
Timers and TRxx for Transmitter Specs, since this is neither of thos types
what is TRM meant to convey?
Solution:
Rename it back to DSM.
Response:
There is no such stated convention regarding the naming of PICS entries.
As
long as there's no conflict with any other name the labels are arbitrary.
Further, the new name relates to the title of the PICS entry "Transitions
Relating to MAC Frames" whereas the committee was unable to see the connection
between "DSM" and the PICS entry.
Status
REJECTED
Commenter Agrees?
Editing Complete
Highlight To Committee
Rebuttal:
Page 4 of 5
21-Jan-99
802.5/99/01-05r1
Comment
MJH-10
Section
A.6
Line
112
Severity
Q
Type
TECH
Concern:
Reference 3.3 has been deleted from this table. Is this correct?
Solution:
Response:
This was done because the transitions are in 4 and 9, and the formats in 3 and
10.
There are entries refering to 3 and 10 elsewhere.
Status
ANSWERED
Commenter Agrees?
Editing Complete
Highlight To Committee
Rebuttal:
Comment
SJH-01
Section
P.0
Line
0
Severity
A/C
Type
ED
Concern:
Annex P in ISO/IEC 8802-5 : 1998 has an incorrect header at the top of the odd
pages … see page 243. The date is incorrect.
Solution:
Correct to 1998.
Response:
Good spot.
However this document is not dealing with purely editorial issues.
Status
REJECTED
Commenter Agrees?
Editing Complete
Highlight To Committee
Rebuttal:
Page 5 of 5
21-Jan-99
802.5/99/01-05r1
802.5w/d1: Comment Index
Errata
EDTR-17
2
KR-01
1
MJH-01
1
MJH-02
2
MJH-03
2
MJH-04
2
MJH-05
3
MJH-06
3
MJH-07
3
MJH-08
3
MJH-09
4
MJH-10
5
MJH-11
4
NAJ-01
1
NAJ-02
3
NAJ-03
4
NAJ-04
4
SJH-01
5
Index Page 1
21-Jan-99
802.5/99/01-05r1
Errata
802.5w/d1: Comment Summary
MJH-09 MJH-10
Total
To Be
Closed
Total Comments:
18
12
0
4
0
0
2
ED
TECH
A/C
DIS
Q
Total A/C Comments:
12
Total DIS Comments:
4
Total Q Comments:
2
NAJ-01 KR-01 MJH-07 MJH-08 SJH-01
0
OPEN
7
ACCEPTED
7
MODIFIED
2
REJECTED
2
ANSWERED
0
WITHDRAWN
0
0
6
1
2
0
MJH-01 MJH-02 MJH-03 MJH-04 MJH-06 MJH-05 MJH-11
EDTR-17 NAJ-02 NAJ-03 NAJ-04
DIS Comment IDs:
Q Comment IDs:
A/C Comment IDs:
Comment IDs by Type. Bold IDs require closure.
Summary Page 1
21-Jan-99
802.5/99/01-05r1
  • Accueil Accueil
  • Univers Univers
  • Ebooks Ebooks
  • Livres audio Livres audio
  • Presse Presse
  • BD BD
  • Documents Documents