Microsoft PowerPoint Viewer - Marc Stanley_présentation

Administrateur 107

Description

Delivering Societal. Benefits: Outcomes from the U.S. Advanced. Technology Program. National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology ...

Sujets

• Économie
• Economy

Informations

• Publié par: paul.vallen
• Nombre de lectures: 33
• Langue: English
• Poids de l'ouvrage: 2 Mo

Extrait

DeliverinieocltagS  Bts: nefiomesOutcmf ore the U.S. Adecnavd Technology Program

Marc G. Stanley ATP Director 301 975-2162 [e-mail] | www.atp.nist.gov

French-American Foundation and the National Academies Perspectives on the U.S. Innovation System:   ioutolEvs It,n Chalenewaeld Roposd Pr ,nagnsee March 1, 2005, Paris, France National Institute of Standards and Technology   Technology Administration  U.S. Department of Commerce

ATP Mission 

Toccaereleatthe development ofevitaovnni technologiesfornolabrnatioad  benefitthroughrtparsnepshiwith the private sector.

National Institute of Standards and Technology   Technology Administration  U.S. Department of Commerce

vatiinno on asisn taordarob nof icomonecl naiohpmE

      

National Institute of Standards and Technology   Technology Administration  U.S. Department of Commerce

benefit Industry leadership in planning and implementing projects Project selection based on technical and economic merit Demonstrated need for ATP funding Requirement that projects have well-defined goals/sunset provisions Project selection rigorously competitive, based on peer review Program evaluation from the outset

Key Features of the ATP

ATP is Part of NIST

NIST assets include:

™ budget$858 million FY 2005 operating ™3,000 employees ™1,800 associates ™NIST laboratories: National measurement standards

™Advanced Technology Program: $2,269 million co- funding with industry since 1990 ™Manufacturing Extension Partnership: 400 centers nationwide to help small manufacturers ™Baldrige National Quality Award

National Institute of Standards and Technology   Technology Administration  U.S. Department of Commerce

Gaithersburg, MD

NIST Mission 

Strengthenthe U.S. economy

andverompithe quality of life

Boulder, CO

by working with industry to

develop and apply technology,

measurements, and standards.

National Institute of Standards and Technology   Technology Administration  U.S. Department of Commerce

National Institute of Standards and Technology   Technology Administration  U.S. Department of Commerce

       

requesting$14,708 Mfrom ATP 768 projects awardedwith1,511 participantsand an equal number of subcontractors 218 joint venturesand550 single companies $4,371 Mofhigh-risk researchfunded   share = $2,269 MPTA  nIudtsyrs aherM 201,2$ =  Small businesses are thriving   %fo66d bys leject proams lnisuessesb  Over170   universitiesparticipate Over30   national laboratoriesparticipate Over1,171 patents

Since 1990 

ns,itiompet 4ocot4 et dmbti 429porplasous sAot t oal6,f 

ATP Projects: Market-Driven Solutions to Societys Technical Chalsgeen

National Institute of Standards and Technology   Technology Administration  U.S. Department of Commerce

Addressing a National Problem or Need

Evidence  Federal funding plays a critical role in crossing the Valley of Death  ATP represents a more important element in bridging this gap than may have been appreciated  VC, State Government and Universities only contribute between 8 and 16% toward early stage technology development  ATP and SBIR account for between 21 and 25%

Lewis M. BranscombPhilip E. Auerswald Aetna Professor of Public PolicyAssistant Director, Science, And Corporate Management, emeritusTechnology, and Public Policy Program Kennedy School of Government, Harvard UniversityKennedy School of Government, Harvard University

National Institute of Standards and Technology   Technology Administration  U.S. Department of Commerce

National In go ynd adsarolhnec T etutitsdnatS fo

Estimated distribution of funding sources for early- stage technology development, based on restrictive and inclusive criteria

NoteThe proportional distribution across the main funding sources for early-stage: technology development is similar regardless of the use of restrictive or inclusive definitional criteria.

  Technology Administration  U.S. Department of Commerce





Two Major Criteria

Scientific and Technological Merit  Technical innovation  High technical risk with evidence of feasibility  Detailed technical plan

Potential for Broad-Based Economic Benefits  National economic benefits  Need for ATP funding  Pathway to economic benefits

National Institute of Standards and Technology   Technology Administration  U.S. Department of Commerce

Inputs z ATP funding z Industry cost- share

ATP Measures Against Mission

EVALUATION

Outputs z R&D partnering z Risky, innovative technologies z S&T knowledge

Outcomes z Acceleration z Commercial activity

FEEDBACK

Impacts z Broad national economic benefits

National Institute of Standards and Technology   Technology Administration  U.S. Department of Commerce