Vital Resource Vital Resource for Medical-Legal for Medical SOLUTIONS M EDICAL C ONSULTANTS October 2004 Volume 5, Issue 3 AURICULAR CONDUCTIVITY MEASUREMENTS FOR CHRONIC PAIN By Peter Chase, DDS; Paula Spaight, BS, RDH, L.AC.; K. Megan Scott, Ph. D; and Benedict Messana, MD pathology by detecting low skin resistance in corresponding INTRODUCTION somatotopic points in the ear. (2) The overall purpose of this study is to evaluate Auricu-lotherapy as a tool for clinical diagnosis in the setting of a Within the setting of the Chronic Orofacial Pain Clinic at the chronic orofacial pain referral center. Since auricular diagno- University of the Pacific (UOP) Dental School, we intend to sis and treatment are not yet mainstream clinical tools, we evaluate this methodology in a controlled manner. Our ap-evaluate our initial level of interobserver reliability using this proach to patient care requires that more than one examiner be skin conductivity measuring device (Stimflex 400A). capable of carrying out an auricular diagnostic protocol. There-fore, we intend to perform the study with two examiners carrying STUDY OBJECTIVE out all measurements on each study subject (see Materials & Part I: To determine how consistently two observers using Methods section). Since this adds an additional variable to the written guidelines obtain equivalent measurements from the data collection, we intend to perform the study in two parts. Part same ...
AURICULAR CONDUCTIVITY MEASUREMENTS FOR CHRONIC PAIN By Peter Chase, DDS;Paula Spaight, BS, RDH, L.AC.; K. Megan Scott, Ph. D; and Benedict Messana, MD
ME D I C A LCO N S U L T A N T S in the same locations (based on map) and with same technique AURICULAR CONDUCTIVITY (CONT.) as the other.The subject‘s ear skin was pulled slightly taut and the point of greatest increase in skin conductivity, demon subject’s age, gender and the presence or absence of pain in strated by the greatest deflection in analog resistance meter. specific parts of the body.For the purposes of this study, six That point was numerically entered in subject record as a value areas of the body were considered: Thumb, Hand, Wrist, Fore between 0 – 9 meg ohm.A value between 0 – 4 meg ohm was arm, Elbow and Shoulder.These six (6) areas correspond to considered “reactive” (lowered resistance, increased conductiv the 6 somatotopic points in each ear that would subsequently ity) and a reading 5 – 9 considered “nonreactive”. Noelectri have electrical conductivity measurements taken by study ex cal stimulation was performed.The examiners were blinded to aminers. Inthis study, no medical history was taken other than clinical questionnaire information until after conductivity meas the questionnaire and no physical exam performed besides urements were taken.A complete set of data points was col auricular conductivity measurements. lected on 39 subjects, resulting in 468 total data points (12 x Torecord data, a separate, 39). Toenable more meaningful two page form was used for each comparison, each observer’s nu subject, one for each examiner. merical reading was converted as Each page required entry of 12 follows: O – 4 = “reactive” or data points by each examiner, six “treatable”; 5– 9 = “nonreactive” points on each ear.With two or “nontreatable”.For each data examiners collecting data on point measured, the two observers each subject, there were 24 data either: agreed(both reactive or points taken for each of 39 sub both nonreactive), or disagreed jects in the project. (one reactive & one nonreactive). The emphasis in this Part RESULTS: Thetwo observers (one) of the study is placed on were in agreement for 304 of 468 interobserver reliability.We de data points.That is, in 64.9% or in liberately chose two observers approximately 2 out of every 3 data (PS & KMS) with different levels points measured, the two observers of experience in auricular acu agreedthe measurement was that puncture. Oneexaminer (PS) is either reactive or nonreactive (or, a licensed acupuncturist with 10+ nd treatable vs. nontreatable).In 1 out of every 3 data points years of experience.The 2(KMS) is a clinical psychologist measured, the two observersdisagreedRe: reactivevs. non and biofeedback therapist with minimal background in acu reactive. Inany given subject (with 12 data points), the level of puncture techniques. agreement between the two observers ranged from a low of Theexact location of each auricular testing point was based 25% (1 subject)to a high of 100% (2 subjects). on somatotopic mapping illustrated in a study by Oleson, 1980. CONCLUSIONS: Usinga particular set of guidelines, the ob (1) (Figure 1). Auricularconductivity measurements were servers in this study fell short of an acceptable level of agree taken using the StimFlex 400A device by Electro Medical Inc. ment that would be expected of a measurement that is used for The device is similar to a galvanic skin resistance (GSR) bio clinical decision making.Based on our experience in this feedback instrument.The StimFlex consists of a metaltipped study, we have noted several aspects of the research protocol probe with a springloaded stylus, a source of constant 9V DC that could be modified in order to raise the interobserver reli current and an analog current meter.The metal stylus quanti ability to a clinicallyacceptable level.The possible changes to fied the amount of current flowing through ear point; it was protocol could include the following:1) develop a more regi springloaded to avoid pressureinduced changes in conductiv mented technique for measuring auricular conductivity;2) ity. Allsubjects had each of 12 data points (6 per ear) meas teach the modified technique to all clinical participants prior to ured by both observers during a single clinic visit.The subjects initiating a repeat study;3) standardize all the data collection were examined in a sitting position and had their auricular skin and recording methods; 4) study a patient population with more cleaned with alcohol prior to any measurements.Each ob pathology.server was blinded to the other’s measurements during the BIBLIOGRAPHY clinic visit.Each attempted to perform the measurements in the same locations (based on map) and with same technique1 )Oleson, TD, et al.An experimental evaluation of auricular as the other.The subject‘s ear skin was pulled slightly taut anddiagnosis: thesomatotopic mapping of musculoskeletal pain at the probe held perpendicular to the skin.A wooden tongueear acupuncture points.Pain. 1980;8:217229. blade was placed behind the pinna for added stability.With the2) Bergsmann,O, et al.Differences in electrical skin conduc springloaded probe compressed from 10 – 40% of springtivity between acupuncture points and adjacent skin areas. travel distance, the probe was glided slowly over each desigAmerican Journal of Acupuncture. 1973; 1: 2732. nated site to find blinded to the other’s measurements during the clinic visit.Each attempted to perform the measurements specialistexperienceservices
News and Information from Benchmark Medical Consultants
ME D I C A LCO N S U L T A N T S 10423 Old Placerville Road, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 95827
PRSRT STD US POSTAGE PAID SACRAMENTO CA PERMIT NO 333
BE N C H M A R KI SP L E A S E DT OA N N O U N C EO U RN E W E S TI N D E P E N D E N TC O N S U L T A N T S Smith, DavidAddiction MedicinePaik, Clara K.Obstetrics Gynecology Eaton, MarkCardiologyOphthalmologyCohen, Steven Sorensen, JerryOral Surgery Lovaas, JasonChiropractic D'Ambrosia, Robert D.Orthopedic Surgery Conser, HansChiropractic Donatto, Keith C.Orthopedic Surgery Davis, PaulChiropractic Meli, Paul I.Orthopedic Surgery Steady, StephenGastroenterology/ Herbertson, F. JamesOrthopedic Surgery InternalMedicine Mitchell, AlbertOsteopath Palmer, GaryHematology Spake, RobertOtolaryngology Rinck, GraceIndustrial Hygienist Hazenfield, HughOtolaryngology Shockley, Karen G.Industrial Hygienist Goodman, GaryPediatrics Smith, lll, David M.Infectious Diseases Windsor, Robert E.PM & R Gandhi, MonicaInfectious Diseases Smith, TerryPodiatry Sidhu, Asha P.S. InternalMedicine Wong, GordonPulmonology/Infectious ZwellingAamot, MarcyInternal Medicine Diseases/InternalMedicine Coleman, Alan J.Nephrology Brown, ChristopherPulmonology /Toxicology/ Schnapper, RobertNeurology InternalMedicine/Critical Care Sauer, Richard N.Neurology Rawal, A. O.Radiology Gannon, PeterNeurology Weinberger, Alan W.Rheumatology Riedler, ScottNeurology Hollinger, MannfredToxicology Tahmouresie, AliNeurosurgeryUrologySmith, Robert Lee Saleh, JamshidNeurosurgeryClayson, Karl R.Vascular Surgery
CrashPort is a leading provider of auto injury bio mechanical and accident reconstruction claims analysis services. The Company is a venture of TecMasters, Inc., Huntsville, Ala., a leading pro vider of mathematical modeling development and validation services to government, defense and commercial businesses. Crashport and Benchmark have developed a multispecialty joint service to promote early intervention for all case reviews thereby saving claims adjusters time and the insur ance companies money.
Tip the scales in your favor. MacroPro, the premiere subpoena, copy, and information service, gathers evidence and witnesses for litigated Civil, Federal, Long shore and Worker's Compensation cases and unlitigated claims.MacroPro finds more records, gets them faster, and provides exceptional service from order to completion.MacroPro is completely computerized, with stateoftheart equipment, so things don’t fall through the cracks!Benchmark and MacroPro have linked technology to seamlessly transfer your case records to your consultant.
Second Image, Inc. is a leading provider of com prehensive information services to the legal and insurance communities. Second Image has stream lined the litigation process by using the Internet to distribute medical records requested by authorized parties. Second Image provides secure, instant access to these documents through a proprietary, featurerich online service. By leveraging these new technologies, Second Image helps its clients including insurance companies, claims adjustors, and legal firms to save significant amounts of time and money, as well as greatly reduce paperwork. Based in San Dimas, California,Benchmark and Second Image have linked technology to seam lessly transfer your case records to your consultant.
Robert Smoke, R.P.A., is licensed as both an insur ance adjuster and private investigator.With his state wide network of licensed and insured private investi gators, he offers AOE/COE investigations, plus pro fessional surveillance and SIU investigations for se lect clients.RB Smoke and Benchmark have devel oped a multispecialty joint service to create efficiency for claims adjusters, saving them time and the insur ance companies money.
Benchmark Medical Consultants 10423 Old Placerville Rd. Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 95827 916.920.2272 1.800.458.1261 www.BMCadmin.com