Homeostatic regulation of long-term potentiation [Elektronische Ressource] / vorgelegt von Claudia Roth-Alpermann
100 pages
English

Découvre YouScribe en t'inscrivant gratuitement

Je m'inscris

Homeostatic regulation of long-term potentiation [Elektronische Ressource] / vorgelegt von Claudia Roth-Alpermann

Découvre YouScribe en t'inscrivant gratuitement

Je m'inscris
Obtenez un accès à la bibliothèque pour le consulter en ligne
En savoir plus
100 pages
English
Obtenez un accès à la bibliothèque pour le consulter en ligne
En savoir plus

Description

Homeostatic regulation of long-term potentiationDissertation zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaftender Fakultät für Biologie der Ludwigs-Maximilians-Universität MünchenVorgelegt von Claudia Roth-AlpermannMünchen, im Januar 2005 Ehrenwörtliche VersicherungIch versichere hiermit ehrenwörtlich, dass die vorgelegte Dissertation von mir selbständig und ohne unerlaubte Beihilfe angefertigt ist.Claudia Roth-AlpermannMünchen, den 23. Januar 2005Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 23. Februar 2005Prüfungskommission:Prof. Dr. Tobias Bonhoeffer. Martin KorteProf. Dr. Benedikt Grothe. Rainer UhlAcknowledgementsI would like to thank Professor Tobias Bonhoeffer for initiating this project, together with Profes-sor Richard Morris, and for giving me the opportunity to perform the experiments in his laborato-ry. I am grateful that I could work in an atmosphere of freedom and personal responsibility. Yet, he gave his scientific and personal advice whenever I asked for it. I was fortunate to have Professor Martin Korte as advisor. He taught me a lot – about science and beyond. He stirred questions, gave advice, and provided encouragement in the right dosage. I thank him for all the time and effort and for his guidance and friendship throughout the years. I am deeply indebted to Volker Staiger for his outstanding technical assistance.

Sujets

Informations

Publié par
Publié le 01 janvier 2005
Nombre de lectures 82
Langue English
Poids de l'ouvrage 2 Mo

Extrait

Homeostatic regulation of long-term potentiation
Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften
der Fakultät für Biologie der Ludwigs-Maximilians-Universität München
Vorgelegt von Claudia Roth-Alpermann
München, im Januar 2005 Ehrenwörtliche Versicherung
Ich versichere hiermit ehrenwörtlich, dass die vorgelegte Dissertation von mir selbständig und
ohne unerlaubte Beihilfe angefertigt ist.
Claudia Roth-Alpermann
München, den 23. Januar 2005Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 23. Februar 2005
Prüfungskommission:
Prof. Dr. Tobias Bonhoeffer. Martin Korte
Prof. Dr. Benedikt Grothe. Rainer UhlAcknowledgements
I would like to thank Professor Tobias Bonhoeffer for initiating this project, together with Profes-
sor Richard Morris, and for giving me the opportunity to perform the experiments in his laborato-
ry. I am grateful that I could work in an atmosphere of freedom and personal responsibility. Yet, he
gave his scientific and personal advice whenever I asked for it.
I was fortunate to have Professor Martin Korte as advisor. He taught me a lot – about science and
beyond. He stirred questions, gave advice, and provided encouragement in the right dosage. I
thank him for all the time and effort and for his guidance and friendship throughout the years.
I am deeply indebted to Volker Staiger for his outstanding technical assistance. He helped me with
countless smaller and bigger problems without ever losing his patience, and I appreciate his moral
at least as high as his technical support.
I wish to thank Professor Richard Morris for his continued and enthusiastic interest in this project.
Exchanging ideas with him was a delightful source of inspiration.
I would like to thank Professor Axel Borst for the knowledge and advice he extended to me – for-
merly as my academic teacher at the University of Tübingen and now as member of my thesis
commi�ee.
Thanks to all members of the Bonhoeffer lab for: answering my questions and questioning my an-
swers, offering words of encouragement, engaging in scientific and non-scientific discussions, len-
ding a hand or an ear, playing volleyball, for jelly bears, useful suggestions and ironic comments
and for swimming trips to lake Starnberg.
I wish to thank Dr. Marjorie Parkis for proof reading my thesis and for radiating so much positive
energy and optimism.
The last four years would have certainly been less enjoyable without Dr. Antje Brand. It was always
fun to make things happen with her and she is one of my favorite persons to spend my daily allo-
wance of words with.
I sincerely would like to thank my parents and my brother for their loving support throughout my
studies and my thesis work.
With all my heart, I would like to thank Holger for his love and understanding. He shared joy and
frustration with me, but most important, he helped pu�ing things back into perspective. And he
always found a way to make me laugh.Table of Contents
1. Summary 1
2. Introduction
2.1 Hebbian plasticity 3
2.2 Homeostasis in the nervous system 7
2.2.1 Homeostasis of the intrinsic electrical properties of neurons:
The example of pa�ern generation 8
2.2.2 Synaptic homeostasis in the peripheral nervous system:
The example of the nerve-muscle-synapse 8
2.2.3 Synaptic homeostasis in the central nervous system:
The example of synaptic scaling 9
2.2.4 Homeostatic regulation of Hebbian plasticity:
The example of metaplasticity 12
2.3 Scope of this study 13
3. Methods
3.1 The hippocampus 15
3.2 Preparation of acute hippocampal slices 16
3.3 Electrophysiology 17
3.3.1 Stimulation 18
3.3.2 Extracellular recording 19
3.3.3 Intracellular recording 19
3.3.4 Electrical and chemical LTP 20
3.4 Local superfusion technique 21
3.4.1 Superfusion device 22
3.4.2 Superfusion solution 25
3.4.3 Time lapse study of the superfusion spot 26
3.5 Data acquisition and analysis 284. Results
4.1 Extracellular recordings 31
4.1.1 Probing the homeostatic hypothesis with potentiated synapses 31
4.1.2 Probing the homeostatic hypothesis with saturated synapses 33
4.2 Probing the homeostatic hypothesis on a single neuron 37
4.3 Probing the homeostatic hypothesis by potentiating a large number of synapses 42
4.3.1 Chemical potentiation as a means to stimulate
a large proportion of synapses 43
4.3.2 Superfusion experiments: Homeostasis upon widespread synaptic
strengthening? 47
4.3.3 Number of synapses in the superfusion spot 52
5. Discussion
5.1 Extracellular experiments 55
5.2 Intracellular experiments 56
5.3 Self-normalization through spike-timing dependent plasticity? 58
5.4 Superfusion experiments 59
5.5 Threshold for homeostatic shut-down 61
5.6 Information processing in the hippocampus 64
5.7 Can synaptic plasticity shut down learning? 64
5.8 Can learning shut down synaptic plasticity? 66
5.9 Homeostatic shut-down of LTP:
similarities and differences to other homeostatic processes 67
5.10 Possible mechanisms for homeostatic shut-down 70
5.11 Conclusion and outlook 75
6. References 77
Abbreviations 89
Curriculum Vitae 91Summary 1
1. Summary
In developing neuronal circuits, homeostatic but were not conclusive, as it is possible that
regulation of global synaptic strength can the number of synapses activated by the first
operate over a timeframe of several days stimulus was too low to trigger a homeostatic
(Turrigiano et al., 1998). However, also in down-regulation of the remaining synapses’
the adult nervous system, protection against ability to undergo LTP.
runaway synaptic strengthening might be
necessary, especially in highly plastic brain In an a�empt to overcome such a possible
structures such as the hippocampus. If threshold, I performed experiments using
too many synapses of a single neuron are chemical potentiation to induce very
potentiated, a neuron might be at risk of widespread synaptic strengthening throughout
overexcitation; and in addition, this might the slice. Initial experiments confirmed that
reduce the information-storage capacity of chemical LTP was NDMA-receptor dependent
the respective neuronal circuits (Moser et and previous chemical potentiation occluded
al., 1998). I therefore hypothesized that some later tetanic LTP induction, indicating that
fast-acting homeostatic mechanism might both forms of potentiation share common
be in place that, a�er a certain threshold of intracellular signaling pathways. I then used
overall potentiation is reached, limits further a local superfusion technique to selectively
synaptic strenghening at heterosynaptic spare a small number of synapses from being
sites. To test this hypothesis, I performed chemically potentiated. Pharmacological
long-lasting extracellular and intracellular blockade of synaptic transmission outside
electrophyiological recordings in acute the superfusion spot allowed me to
hippocampal slices of rats using the classical electrophysiologically isolate the inside-
NMDA-receptor dependent CA3-CA1 LTP. spot synapses. I then tested whether these
superfused, and hence unpotentiated,
In a first series of experiments, I observed, synapses inside the spot were still capable
that one hour a�er saturating LTP through of exhibiting LTP. My data show, that under
repeated tetanizations of one Schaffer these conditions the inside-spot synapses did
collateral pathway, hippocampal CA1 not exhibit potentiation. Control experiments
neurons still exhibited additional potentiation established that LTP can be induced at inside-
at heterosynaptic sites in response to a LTP spot synapses if prior chemical potentiation
stimulus in a second independent pathway. has not occurred. These findings strongly
Neither the amount nor the persistence of this support the presence of a homeostatic
LTP differed from the LTP induced in naïve mechanism under circumstances in which a
control slices that had not sustained saturating sufficient proportion of a neuron’s synapses
LTP induction. These findings argued against have previously undergone LTP.
homeostatic protection against LTP saturation, 2

  • Univers Univers
  • Ebooks Ebooks
  • Livres audio Livres audio
  • Presse Presse
  • Podcasts Podcasts
  • BD BD
  • Documents Documents