Mate choice and reproductive strategies in recently diverged populations of the house mouse (Mus musculus domesticus) [Elektronische Ressource] / vorgelegt von Inka Montero
108 pages
English

Mate choice and reproductive strategies in recently diverged populations of the house mouse (Mus musculus domesticus) [Elektronische Ressource] / vorgelegt von Inka Montero

Le téléchargement nécessite un accès à la bibliothèque YouScribe
Tout savoir sur nos offres
108 pages
English
Le téléchargement nécessite un accès à la bibliothèque YouScribe
Tout savoir sur nos offres

Description

Mate choice and reproductive strategies in recently diverged populations of the house mouse (Mus musculus domesticus) Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel vorgelegt von Inka Montero Plön, 2010 Referent: Prof. Dr. Diethard Tautz Koreferent: Prof. Dr. Hinrich Schulenburg Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 12. 01. 2011 Zum Druck genehmigt: 18. 01. 2011 gez: 2List of Contents List of Contents List of Contents ............................................................................................................1 List of Figures and Tables............................................................................................3 Danksagung........................................................5 Zusammenfassung..............................................7 Abstract........................................................................................................................9 Declaration........................................................11 1 General Introduction...........................................................................................12 1.1 Studying mate choice in the context of population divergence ..................1.2 The house mouse..............................13 1.2.

Sujets

Informations

Publié par
Publié le 01 janvier 2010
Nombre de lectures 89
Langue English

Extrait



Mate choice and reproductive strategies
in recently diverged populations of
the house mouse
(Mus musculus domesticus)






Dissertation




zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades
der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät
der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel

vorgelegt von



Inka Montero




Plön, 2010


































Referent: Prof. Dr. Diethard Tautz
Koreferent: Prof. Dr. Hinrich Schulenburg

Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 12. 01. 2011

Zum Druck genehmigt: 18. 01. 2011

gez:


2List of Contents
List of Contents

List of Contents ............................................................................................................1

List of Figures and Tables............................................................................................3

Danksagung........................................................5

Zusammenfassung..............................................7

Abstract........................................................................................................................9

Declaration........................................................11

1 General Introduction...........................................................................................12
1.1 Studying mate choice in the context of population divergence ..................
1.2 The house mouse..............................13
1.2.1 The European Western house mouse as a model organism for
evolutionary studies ...................................13
1.2.2 Mouse phylogeny...............................................................................14
1.2.3 Life history of the house mouse..........................................................15
1.3 Aim of the study.........................................................................16

2 Mate choice between individuals of two separated house mouse populations (M.
m. domesticus)..................................................17
2.1 Introduction........................17
2.2 Methods......................................................................................................19
2.2.1 Long-term Experiment................
2.2.2 Controlled female choice in a cage system ........................24
2.3 Results from the Long-term Experiment.....................................................26
2.3.1 Population development.....................................................................26
2.3.2 Paternity assignment..........................................................................28
2.3.3 Assortative mate choice29
2.3.4 Reproductive success........................................................................35
2.3.5 Multiple mating frequencies................................................................47
2.3.6 Social partner choice ..48
2.3.7 Social status..............................49
2.4 Results from the Controlled Cage Experiment ...........................................52
2.5 Discussion.................................................................................53
2.5.1 Paternity analysis......................
2.5.2 Population Development....................................................54
2.5.3 Assortative mating.....................55
2.5.4 Reproductive success........................................................................56
2.5.5 Relative fertilization success ..............................................................
2.5.6 Relative testis weight.................57
2.5.7 Multiple paternity...............................................................
2.5.8 Communal breeding as a measure for social partner choice .............57
2.5.9 Fitness.......................................58
2.6 Conclusion.................




1List of Contents
3 The role of different molecular parameters for mate choice and individual
reproductive strategies...............................................................................................59
3.1 Introduction................59
3.1.1 Background and focus of the investigation.........................................
3.1.2 Mate choice and its benefits in house mice................59
3.1.3 Strategies related to reproduction ......................................60
3.1.4 Genetic parameters involved in mate choice......................................62
3.2 Methods........................................................................................64
3.3 Results.......................................................................................................67
3.3.1 Communal breeding..................
3.3.2 Multiple mating..........................70
3.3.3 Effects of the t haplotype....................................................................76
3.3.4 Parameters correlating with male reproductive success ....................83
3.4 Discussion.........................................85
3.4.1 Communal breeding..................
3.4.2 Multiple paternity...............................................................87
3.4.3 Effects of the t Haplotype...............89
3.4.4 Parameters correlating with reproductive success .............................91
3.5 Conclusion.........................................92

References........................................................93

Supplement..............................................................................................................101
Supplement 1: Description Access Database ......................................................101
Overview tables.......................................101
Detailed description tblMice ....................101

Digital Supplement..........................................104

Erklärung..................................................................................................................105

Lebenslauf.......................................................................106

2List of Figures and Tables
List of Figures and Tables

Figures

Figure 1.1: Colonization history of Mus musculus domesticus. ................................14
Figure 2.1: Allele sharing tree, migration route of house mice.................17
Figure 2.2: Schematic figure of animals in F0 and F1 generations..........19
Figure 2.3: Enclosures used for the experiments......................................................21
Figure 2.4: Experimental setup of the controlled cage experiment. ..........................25
Figure 2.5: Sex ratio in the four replicates: ...............................................................27
Figure 2.6: Sex ratio of offspring...............................................................................27
Figure 2.7: Relative proportion of “pure” and “mixed” animals..................................28
Figure 2.8: Mating events between individuals of F0................................................30
Figure 2.9: Matings between F0 animals, excluding t haplotype animals.................31
Figure 2.10: Number of successful mating events between F1 animals...31
Fi1: Relative number of mating events between F1......................................32
Figure 2.12: Mating events female F0, male F1.........................................................33
Fi3venle F1, male F0.33
Figure 2.14: Father related assortative mating pattern for F1 females/F0 males ......34
Fi5iving pattern: Pairs....................................34
Figure 2.16: Reproductive success of F0 males...............36
Fi7uccess of F1 males.........................................37
Figure 2.18tive success of males born in the enclosure...........................38
Fi9: Reproducuccess of F0 females.....................................................39
Figure 2.20tive success of F1 females40
Fi1uccess for females born in the enclosure ......................41
Figure 2.22: Individual average of fertilization success..............................................43
Figure 2.23: Relative fertilization success in intra- versus inter-population matings..44
Figure 2.24: Relative fertiln su in matings related to father ......................44
Fi5: Female attractiveness............................................................45
Figure 2.26: Male attractiveness.......................46
Fi7: Relative Testis Weight ..47
Figure 2.28: Monitoring records separated for sexes.................................................50
Fi9: Monitoring records of F0 population ......................................................50
Figure 2.30: Monitoring records (relative) for males born in the enclosure................51
Fi1: Individual condition recorded during monitoring ....................................51
Figure 2.32: Female preferences in the cage experiment..........................................52
Figure 3.1: Genetic map of chromosome 17 of wild-type

  • Univers Univers
  • Ebooks Ebooks
  • Livres audio Livres audio
  • Presse Presse
  • Podcasts Podcasts
  • BD BD
  • Documents Documents