On the role of bankruptcy laws in credit markets [Elektronische Ressource] / vorgelegt von Luděk Koleček

Ludek Kolecek

Description

henaLutebruarhakultäteRyoersitlehaovfkB:anorreferenkhlussbrUniuptMolyheLa00wvsinoCreReferenditDr.MarketshnitzerIProf.naPromotiougu7.ralOn-DviätssertatioVnkswirtsczurErlangungFdes2Grades6DoorgelegtonodeconoemiaeKpublicaele(Dr.toProf.ec.Monikpubl.Sc)Kant:derRaLudReeswig-MaximieratunglFi2007ans-htionttknoewlemandgeymenermissiontG)IallwtheirouldInlikaeandtohoexpressmDeutscyFinalgratitudemtoecialallthisthosewhotgaanvFeGerritmeMugele,theola.possibilifortthesisythetosupphthisythesis.IIyamtheirdeeplyandindebtedtotoenabledmAyysupandervisorstimProf.ngDr.IMoniktoaCerScCin-hnitzerChristawhoseandcematestnacademichelawvthankeryGraduatehelpfulofmeandthetintououssarysuppork.ortfromhelpFedhaftmealsoinknoallytheouldtimethankoftssisterhortforywritingythisbthesis.whosePvtotsork.offorthemandohelpfultsSeminarouratytheulaChairifordiscussions.Comparativparticular,ewEconomicstatmentheDanielUnivquera,ersitynirellof,Hainz,hRothhamvoeChristianbRomaieenBaereswilimportaCoppnItantoofthehkScandolEconomicst.givingIpwtoouldthislikinersttoandthankdoProf.

Informations

• Publié par: ludwig-maximilians-universitat_munchen
• Publié le: 01 janvier 2007
• Nombre de lectures: 9
• Langue: English

Extrait

V
On
Sc
t
d
h
2007
e
2
R

o
Rees
le
?t
o

f
orgelegt
B
K
an
Prof.
k
t:
r
eratung
upt
v


y
kswirtsc
La
F
w
6
s
on
in
e
Cre
le
dit
t
Markets
Monik
I
K
na
Ra
ugu

ral
F
-D
Uni
i
ersit
ss
M
ertatio
hen
n
ol
zur
ha
Erlangung
he
des
akult?t
Grades
00
Do
v

v
o
Lu
econo

miae
k
publicae
o
(Dr

.
Referen
o
:
ec.
Dr.
publ.
a
)
hnitzer
an
orreferen
der
Prof.
Lud
y
wig-
Promotio
Maximi
hlussb
l
7.
i
ebruar
a
ns-w
A
Daniel

lo
kno
to
wle
to
dge
y
men
o
t
to
I
is
w
these
ould
man
lik
particular,
e
,
to

express
ol
m
and
y
he
gratitude
l
to
y
all
thank
those
w
who
ts
ga
i
v
t
e

me
Roth
the
Romai
p
I
ossibili
h
t
giving
y
in
to


ort
this
ungsgemeinsc
thesis.
ac
I
w
am
paren
deeply
supp
indebted
m
to
Magdalena
m
me
y
for
sup
helpful
ervisor
our
Prof.
ula
Dr.
discussions.
Monik
w
a
men
Sc
quera,
hnitzer
nirell
whose
Hainz,

m
t
Christian
academic
Baereswil

Copp
v
an
ery
the
helpful
Sc

Economics
and
p

this
tin
rst
uous
do
supp

ort
Financial
help
the
ed
orsc
me
(DF
in
gratefull
all
wledged.
the
,
time
lik
of
m

and
h
for
for
during
writing
ears
this
sp
thesis.
elongs
P
patien

e
ts

of
1
the
their
do
y


Seminar
and
at
man
the
stim
Chair
t
for
ng
Comparativ
In
e
I
Economics
an
at
to
the
tion
Univ
Cer
ersit
F
y
Cin-
of
a

Christa
h
Gerrit
ha
and
v
y
e
cemates
b
Mugele,
een
n
imp
and
orta
hela
n
ola.
t
w

t
of
thank


k
Graduate
and
ho

of
t.
for
I
me
w
ermission
ould

lik
thesis
e
the
to

thank
to
Prof.
the
Joac
sary
him
h
Win
ork.
ter
supp
and
from
Prof.
Deutsc
Jark
F
o
h
Fidrm
haft
uc
G)
for
also
their
y

kno
ts
Final
on
y
the
I
empiri
ould

e
parts.
thank
F
y
urthermore,
ts
I
m
w
sister
ould
their
lik
ort
e
all
to
y
thank
and
m
y
y
ecial

b
at
to
the
whose

t
h
v
Graduate
enabled
Sc
to
ho
this
ol
ork.
of
Economics.
Con
.
ten
.
ts
T
1
.
In
.
t
an
r
.
o
.
d
.
u
.

.
ion
.
4
v
1.1
In

.
la
.
ws
.
and
Priv

.
righ
del
ts
.
protection
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
La
.
on
.
tries
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
la
4
.
1.1.1
.
Wh
.
y
.
do
.
w
.
e
.
need
.

.
la
.
ws?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
2
.

.
and
.
z
.
ecision
.
Coun
.
7
5

1.1.2
.

.
t
.

.
pro
.

.
.
.
.
2.1.1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
9
.
o
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
6
.
1.1.
2.2
3
.
Creditor-fri
.
endl
.
y
.
vs.
.
debtor-friendly
.

.
la
.
ws
22
.
.
.
.
.
.
8
.
1.1.4
.
Empiri
.

.
observ
.
ations
.
.
.
.
.
.
15
.
B
.
kru
.
y
.
ws
.
Pri
.
ati
.
ati
.
D
.
in
.
ransition
.
-
.
1
.
2.1
.
tro
.
.
.
.
.
.
11
.
1.2
.

.
la
.
ws
.
and
.
priv
.
atizati
.
o
.
n
.

.
in
.
transition
17


tries
ws
12
.
1.3
.

.
la
.
ws
.
and
.
debt
.
renegotiatio
.
n
.
.
.
.
.
.
1
.
2.1.2
.
atizati
.
n
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
14
.
1.4
.
Ho
.
w
.
do
21
es
Mo
the
.

.
la
.
w
.
in
.

.
a
.
lender
.
's
.

.
on
.
in-
.
formati
.
o
.
n
.
sharing?
.
.
.
.
2
..
2.3
.
Scenario
of
1:
.
Unemplo
.
ymen
.
t
on

.
dep
.
ending
.
on
.
the
.
priv
.
atizati
.
o
.
n
.
lev
.
el
.
27
.
2.3.1
.
Optimal
.
e
.
ort
.
-
.
priv
.
ate

rm
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Mo
.
.
.
3.3
.
.
.
3
.
.
.
.
.
Extensiv
.
w
.
.
.
.
.
.
28
.
2.3.2
.
Optimal
A
eort
.
-
.
public
.
rm
.
.
De
.
tro
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
54
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
la
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
31
.
2.3.3
.
Optimal
.

.
la
.
w
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
47
.
s
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
2.7
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
49
31
endix
2.4
.
Scenario
.
2:
.
Old
.
v
.
ersus
.
new
.
rms
51
in
ws
transition
Rene

3.1
tries
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
35
.
2.5
Setup
Example
.

.
Czec
.
h
.
Republic
.
and
.
Hungary
.
.
.
.
3.2.1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
58
.
.
.
.
41
.
2.5.1
.
Priv
.
atizati
.
o
.
n
.
lev

el
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
2.6.3
.
ene
.
s
.
the
.
la
.
.
42
.
2.5.2
.
Initial
.

.
of
.
reforms
49
.
Conclusions
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
2.
43
App
2.5.3
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
3
.
La
.
and
.
bt
.
gotiati
.
54
.
In
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
44
.
2.5.4
.