La lecture à portée de main
Découvre YouScribe en t'inscrivant gratuitement
Je m'inscrisDécouvre YouScribe en t'inscrivant gratuitement
Je m'inscrisDescription
Informations
Publié par | biomed |
Publié le | 01 janvier 2011 |
Nombre de lectures | 6 |
Langue | English |
Extrait
O
’
DeaandAmy
InternationalJournalofBehavioralNutritionandPhysicalActivity
2011,
8
:68
http://www.ijbnpa.org/content/8/1/68
RESEARCH
OpenAccess
Perceivedanddesiredweight,weightrelated
eatingandexercisingbehaviours,andadvice
receivedfromparentsamongthin,overweight,
obeseornormalweightAustralianchildrenand
adolescents
JenniferAO
’
Dea
1
†
andNancyKAmy
1,2*
†Abstract
Background:
Thinchildrenarelessmuscular,weaker,lessactive,andhavelowerperformanceinmeasuresof
physicalfitnessthantheirnormalweightpeers.Thinchildrenarealsomorefrequentlysubjectedtoteasingand
stigmatization.Littleisknownaboutthinchildren
’
sweightperceptions,desiredweightandattitudesand
behaviourstowardsfoodandexercise.Thestudyaimedtocompareperceivedweightstatus,desiredweight,
eatingandexercisebehavioursandadvicereceivedfromparentsamongthin,overweight,obeseornormalweight
Australianchildrenandadolescents.
Methods:
Thesampleincluded8550schoolchildrenaged6to18yearsselectedfromeverystateandterritoryof
Australia.Thechildrenwereweighed,measuredandclassifiedasthin,normal,overweightorobeseusing
internationalstandards.Themainoutcomemeasureswereperceivedanddesiredweight,weightrelatedeating
andexercisingbehaviours,andadvicereceivedfromparents.
Results:
Thedistributionofweightstatuswas-thin4.4%;normalweight70.7%;overweight18.3%;andobese
6.6%.Thinchildrenweresignificantlyshorterthannormalweight,overweightorobesechildrenandtheywerealso
morelikelytoreportregularlyconsumingmealsandsnacks.57.4%ofthinchildren,83.1%ofnormalweight
children,63.7%ofoverweightand38.3%ofobesechildrenperceivedtheirweightas
“
aboutright
”
.Ofthethin
children,53.9%wantedtobeheavier,36.2%wantedtostaythesameweight,and9.8%wantedtoweighless.Thin
childrenweresignificantlylesslikelythanobesechildrentorespondpositivelytostatementssuchas
“
Iamtrying
togetfitter
”
or
“
Ineedtogetmoreexercise.
”
Parentsweresignificantlylesslikelytorecommendexerciseforthin
childrencomparedwithotherweightgroups.
Conclusions:
Thinchildren,aswellasthosewhoareoverweightorobese,arelesslikelythannormalweight
childrentoconsidertheirweight
“
aboutright
’
.Thinchildrendifferfromchildrenofotherweightsinthatthin
childrenarelesslikelytodesiretogetfitterorbeencouragedtoexercise.Bothextremesofthespectrumof
weight,fromunderweighttoobese,mayhaveserioushealthconsequencesfortheindividuals,aswellasfor
publichealthpolicy.Healthandwellnessprogramsthatpromotepositivesocialexperiencesandencourage
exerciseshouldincludechildrenofallsizes.
*Correspondence:nkamy@berkeley.edu
†
Contributedequally
1
FacultyofEducation&SocialWork,BuildingA35,TheUniversityofSydney
NSW,2006,Australia
Fulllistofauthorinformationisavailableattheendofthearticle
©2011O
’
DeaandAmy;licenseeBioMedCentralLtd.ThisisanOpenAccessarticledistributedunderthetermsoftheCreative
CommonsAttributionLicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0),whichpermitsunrestricteduse,distribution,and
reproductioninanymedium,providedtheoriginalworkisproperlycited.
O
’
DeaandAmy
InternationalJournalofBehavioralNutritionandPhysicalActivity
2011,
8
:68
http://www.ijbnpa.org/content/8/1/68
Background
Ifgoodhealthinchildrenwereassociatedwiththemost
desirablebodytypeportrayedinpopularmedia,one
mightexpectthinchildrentobedemonstrablyhealthier
thantheirobese,overweightandperhapsevennormal
weightpeers.Problemsrelatedtomalnutritionandeat-
ingdisordersinthinchildrenhavebeenstudied,but
persistentthinnessthatisnotduetothesecauseshas
receivedlittlescrutiny.
Comparedtonormalweightchildren,thinchildren
mayhavearangeofsignificanthealthproblemsnot
directlyrelatedtomalnutritionandeatingdisorders
including:lowerbodyfatstores;delayedgrowth;
increasedriskofosteoporosis;lowermuscleandskeletal
massassociatedwithlowbonemineralcontent;and
increasedriskofbonefracture[1-7].
Instudiesofphysicalfitness,thinadolescentsspent
lesstimedoingphysicalactivity[8]andhavelowerper-
formanceinmeasurescomparedtonormalweightado-
lescents[1,9].Theremaybean
inutero
explanationfor
thinnessinchildrenthatisassociatedwithmaternal
undernutritioninthatwomenwithlowpre-pregnancy
weightareatincreasedriskofpre-termdelivery,small-
for-gestationalageinfants,andfetalandneonataldeaths
[7,10,11].Further,strongevidenceexistsforthegenetic
basisofthinnessinhumansandanimals.Sinceunder-
weight(aswellasobese)adultssufferincreasedmortal-
ityrelativetonormalweightoroverweightadults[12],
thinchildrenwhobecomethinadultsmaybeatriskof
havingshortenedlifespans.Recentreportsindicatethat
underweightinadulthoodisclearlyassociatedwithan
increasedmortalityduetodiabetes,kidneydisease,
respiratorydisease,infectiousdisease,andothercauses
intheUSA[13]andthatthesediscrepanciesareinde-
pendentofsmokingstatus.
Weightissuesinchildrenareimportantnotonly
becauseofhealthrisks,butalsobecauseofpotential
emotionalconsequencesofpracticessuchasstigmatiza-
tion.Thinchildrenaresubjectedtofrequentteasingata
muchhigherratethannormaloroverweightchildren
andarealsoatagreaterriskofunhealthyweightcontrol
behaviours[14].Thinboysaremorelikelytodislike
schoolandconsiderthemselvestobepoorstudents[15].
Studiesthatexplorebodyimageinchildrengenerally
comparetheattitudesofoverweightandobesechildren
withnon-obesechildren,andtheattitudesofthinchil-
drenarenotreportedseparatelyfromotherchildren.
Littleisknownaboutthinchildren
’
sbodyimage,atti-
tudes,andbehaviourstowardsfoodandexercise.
ThinnessisdefinedaslowBodyMassIndex(BMI)for
ageandgenderinchildren.However,theprevalenceof
thinnessacrosscountriesandyearshasbeendifficultto
comparebecauseunderweighthasbeendefineddiffer-
entlyinthesestudies.Toaddressthisproblem,Cole
Page2of8
developedacommonsetofreferencesforinternational
comparisons[16].Thinnessinchildrenandadolescents
isdefinedbasedonageandgenderspecificcurvesthat
arelinkedtotheWorldHealthOrganization(WHO)
recommendedadultcut-offpointsofBMI16,17,and
18.5atage18.Thesethinnessstandardsallowdistinc-
tionsbetweendifferentgradesofundernutritionand
differentlevelsofriskinchildren.Themethodscur-
rentlyusedworldwidetodevelopthethinnesscut-offs
aresimilartothoseusedbytheInternationalObesity
TaskForce(IOTF)foroverweightandobesitycut-offs
[17]andthereforeallowforthecomparisonofpreva-
lenceofthinness,overweightandobesity.
Theobjectiveofthisstudywastoexaminetherela-
tionshipsbetweenperceivedanddesiredweight,weight
relatedeatingandexercisingbehaviours,andadvice
receivedfromparentsamongthin,overweight,obeseor
normalweightAustralianchildrenandadolescents.
Thestudymeasured:1)theprevalenceofthinness,
normalweight,overweightandobesityinalarge,repre-
sentativepopulationsampleofAustralianschoolchil-
dren;2)thedifferencesinperceivedanddesiredweight,
dietaryhabits,exercisebehavioursandconcernsabout
weightbetweenthinchildrenandtheirpeersofother
sizes;and3)therelationshipbetweentheparental
advicegiventochildrenofdifferentweightstatusand
thechildren
’
s
’
behavioursandattitudesconcerningbody
sizeandexercise.
Methods
DatainthisstudywerecollectedaspartoftheYouth
CulturesofEatingStudy,a3-yearAustralianResearch
Councilfundedstudyofhealth,weight,cultureandeat-
ingamong8550schoolchildrenfromeverystateand
territoryofAustraliain2006.Thedescriptionsofstudy
recruitmentandsamplingaregiveninpreviouslypub-
lishedarticles[18-20].Childreningrades2to12(aged
6to18years)participated,fromrandomlyselectedclass
groupswithinschoolsthathadbeenrandomlyselected
fromlistsofallstateandterritory
’
sschoolsinAustralia.
Thesampleincludedstudentsfrompublic,private,and
Catholicschoolsinbothruralandurbanareas,with
low,middleandhighsocio-economicstatus(SES)levels.
Theethnicdistributionofthesamplewasrepresentative
ofthegeneralpopulationandhasbeendescribedpre-
viously[19].Theparticipationratewashighat82%.
Childrenwereweighedandmeasuredusingdigital
scalesandportablestadiometersinlightschooluni-
forms,afterremovingjackets,shoesandemptyingtheir
pockets,inprivateareasoftheschools,underthesuper-
visionofthefirstauthorandtrainedresearchassistants.
Theprevalenceofnormalweight,overweightandobe-
sitywasmeasuredusingtheInternationalObesityTask
Force(IOTF)BMIcut-offs,withageinyearstakento
O
’
DeaandAmy
InternationalJournalofBehavioralNutritionandPhysicalActivity
2011,
8
:68
http://www.ijbnpa.org/content/8/1/68
the0.5yearscutoff[17].Heightwasmeasuredtothe
nearest0.5cmusingaportablestadiometer.Weightwas
measuredtothenearest0.1kgusingportabledigital
scales.Participants
’
heightandweightwereusedtocal-
culatetheageandsex-adjustedBMIpercentile.Thin-
ness,ingrades1,2,and3childrenandadolescentswas
basedonadultBMIof16,17and18.5at18years,and
curvesprovidedageandsex-specificcut-offpoints[16].
Studentsweregroupedbyageintotwocategories:pri-
maryschoolstudents,aged6to12years;andsecondary
schoolstudents,aged13to18years.
Detailsofthequestionnaireandthestudyvariables
havebeendescribedpreviously[18-20].Thequestion-