The limits of individual liberty

F. C. (Francis Charles) Montague

Description

^dividiia 2^ L134 ^f of these, if earnestlyvariety of pursuits. Every oneinfinite and feeling.distinct habit of thoughtpursued, will develope a and indelible becausedifferences are not the less realSuch findor because they may neverthey are very subtle, metaphysician, a biologist, ain practical life. Aexpression lawyer differ morea politician, and apoet, an historian, men separated by the most im-profoundly than ignorant Peel, the Duke ofbarriers of class. Sir Robertpassable Carlyle, and Darwin wereWellington, Lord Westbury, individuals because they allnot less strongly marked dialect of goodwore broadcloth and conversed in the society. has come toIndeed, those who complain that everybody else are not more earnest or morebe like everybody isnumerous than those who complain that everybody narrowed down to a mere specialist. A critic who took say thatpleasure in hair-splitting might interpose and allmen cannot at once be all specialists and alike. He would not silence the murmurers. They might retort that alikemen are all in narrowness and weakness. They might allege that all are alike in being singly very insigni- ficant. But they would have to allow that the monotony of which they complain does not exclude a wondei'ful variety. after all, strong characters orIf, well-developed individuals are less common than we might fairly expect, the reason must lie deeper than is generally supposed.

Sujets

• Individualism
• Liberty
• Social sciences

Informations

• Publié par: les_archives_du_savoir
• Nombre de lectures: 9
• Langue: English
• Poids de l'ouvrage: 11 Mo

Extrait

<mM^'5 i'vi^-
-t.y.^.
' :.;t
,-*•/
'LKi"Cr.
"1
)U^-THE
LIBERTYINDIVIDUALOFLIMITSlimitslThe
INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY
9ln €Bsnii
FRANCIS C. MONTAGUE
FELLOW OF ORIEL COLLEGE, OXFORD, AND
UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, LONDON
RIVINGTONS
WATERLOO PLACE, LONDON
MDCCCLXXXV
/^^0 i\u iflcmorg
of
ARNOLD TOYNBEE