The Final Arbiter
298 pages
English

Découvre YouScribe en t'inscrivant gratuitement

Je m'inscris

Découvre YouScribe en t'inscrivant gratuitement

Je m'inscris
Obtenez un accès à la bibliothèque pour le consulter en ligne
En savoir plus
298 pages
English
Obtenez un accès à la bibliothèque pour le consulter en ligne
En savoir plus

Description

The resolution of the 2000 presidential election by the U.S. Supreme Court's Bush v. Gore decision generated an extraordinary outpouring of literature in a very short period of time. Now that the initial furor over the decision has subsided, The Final Arbiter presents a sober consideration of the consequences of the decision for the law, the presidency, and the legitimacy of the American political system. The contributors include well-established names in law and political science, as well as up-and-coming scholars, offering a broad understanding of Bush v. Gore's long-term impact. This book will be useful as a classroom text in both survey courses on elections and the courts and for advanced courses that consider the impact of judicial rulings on the government and political process.

LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES

PREFACE

1. Bushed and Gored: A Brief Review of Initial Literature
John C. Green

PART I. LEGAL CONSEQUENCES

2. The Politics of Constitutional Choices in Light of Bush v. Gore (2000)
Christopher P. Banks

3. Bush v. Gore and the Distortion of Common Law Remedies
Tracy A. Thomas

4. Bush v. Gore and Equal Protection: A Unique Case?
Joyce A. Baugh

5. Political Equality after Bush v. Gore: A First Amendment Approach to Voting Rights
Daniel P. Tokaji

6. Bush v. Gore's Place in the Rehnquist Court's Federalism Oeuvre
Ann Althouse

PART II. POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES

7. Governing after Bush v. Gore: The Challenges of Competitive Partisanship
Charles O. Jones

8. Who Needs a Mandate? The Election 2000 Hullabaloo and the Bush Administration's Governing Agenda
Brian J. Gerber and David B. Cohen

9. Election 2000 and the Future of Electoral Administration: Gauging the Impact of Bush v. Gore on State-Level Electoral Reform
Donald Edward Greco

10. Election 2000 and Its Impact on Campaign Strategy
Andrew E. Busch

11. The Impact of Bush v. Gore and Election 2000 on the Judicial Selection Process
John Anthony Maltese

12. Testing the Limits of Democracy: Pragmatic Legitimacy and the Election of 2000
John W. Wells

13. Reliving Groundhog Day? The 2004 Presidential Election and the Legacy of Bush v. Gore
David B. Cohen and Christopher P. Banks

LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS

INDEX

Sujets

Informations

Publié par
Date de parution 01 février 2012
Nombre de lectures 0
EAN13 9780791482841
Langue English
Poids de l'ouvrage 1 Mo

Informations légales : prix de location à la page 0,1648€. Cette information est donnée uniquement à titre indicatif conformément à la législation en vigueur.

Extrait

The Final Arbiter
SUNY series in American Constitutionalism
Robert J. Spitzer, editor
T H E F I N A L A R B I T E R
The Consequences of Bush v. Gore for Law and Politics
Edited by
C H R I S T O P H E R P. B A N K S , D AV I D B . C O H E N , J O H N C . G R E E N A N D
S T AT E U N I V E R S I T Y O F N E W Y O R K P R E S S
Published by STATEUNIVERSITY OFNEWYORKPRESS ALBANY
© 2005 State University of New York
All rights reserved
Printed in the United States of America
No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission. No part of this book may be stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means including electronic, electrostatic, magnetic tape, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior permission in writing of the publisher.
For information, address State University of New York Press 194 Washington Avenue, Suite 305, Albany, NY 12210-2384
Production, Laurie Searl Marketing, Susan Petrie
Library of Congress CataloginginPublication Data
The final arbiter : the consequences of Bush v. Gore for law and politics / edited by Christopher P. Banks, David B. Cohen, and John C. Green. p. cm. — (SUNY series in American constitutionalism) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-7914-6535-7 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Bush, George W. (George Walker), 1946—Trials, litigation, etc. 2. Gore, Albert, 1948—Trials, litigation, etc. 3. Contested elections—United States. 4. Political questions and judicial power— United States. 5. United States. Supreme Court. 6. United States— Politics and government—2001– 7. Law and politics. I. Banks, Christopher P. II. Cohen, David B., 1967– III. Green, John Clifford, 1953– IV. Series.
KF5074.2.F56 2005 320.973—dc22
10
2004029608
 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Dedicated to the memory of our colleague
Marian Miller (1950–2003).
Her passion for politics and justice is a model for us all.
This page intentionally left blank.
Contents
List of Figures and Tables
Preface
One
Two
Three
Four
Five
Six
Bushed and Gored: A Brief Review of Initial Literature John C. Green
Part I. Legal Consequences
The Politics of Constitutional Choices in Light ofBush v. Gore(2000) Christopher P. Banks
Bush v. Goreand the Distortion of Common Law Remedies Tracy A. Thomas
Bush v. Goreand Equal Protection: A Unique Case? Joyce A. Baugh
Political Equality AfterBush v. Gore: A First Amendment Approach to Voting Rights Daniel P. Tokaji
Bush v. Gore’s Place in the Rehnquist Court’s Federalism Oeuvre Ann Althouse
ix
xi
1
29
71
87
107
133
Testing the Limits of Democracy: Pragmatic Legitimacy and the Election of 2000 John W. Wells
Reliving Groundhog Day? The 2004 Presidential Election and the Legacy ofBush v. Gore David B. Cohen and Christopher P. Banks
Election 2000 and the Future of Electoral Administration: Gauging the Impact ofBush v. Goreon State-Level Electoral Reform Donald Edward Greco
Election 2000 and Its Impact on Campaign Strategy Andrew E. Busch
The Impact ofBush v. Goreand Election 2000 on the Judicial Selection Process John Anthony Maltese
207
171
Who Needs a Mandate? The Election 2000 Hullabaloo and the Bush Administration’s Governing Agenda Brian J. Gerber and David B. Cohen
Part II. Political Consequences
Governing AfterBush v. Gore: The Challenges of Competitive Partisanship Charles O. Jones
249
Eight
Twelve
Ten
List of Contributors
Thirteen
Index
Nine
275
263
153
271
Eleven
viii
Seven
T H E F I N A L A R B I T E R
191
225
Figures and Tables
F I G U R E S
2.1 Public Opinion on Legitimacy of George W. Bush 2.2 Public Opinion on Legitimacy of George W. Bush, by Voter Choice 2.3 Public Opinion on Legitimacy of George W. Bush, by Race 2.4 Public Opinion on Confidence in the U.S. Supreme Court 2.5 Public Opinion on Confidence in the U.S. Supreme Court by Voter Choice 2.6 Public Opinion on Confidence in the U.S. Supreme Court I by Party Affiliation 2.7 Public Opinion on Confidence in the U.S. Supreme Court II by Party Affiliation 2.8 Judicial Vacancies and Nominations, 2001 2.9 Judicial Vacancies and Nominations in U.S. Courts of Appeals, 2001 2.10 Judicial Vacancies and Nominations in U.S. District Courts, 2001
9.1 9.2
TA B L E S
Electoral Reform in the States after the 2000 Election The Correlates of Electoral Reform: Political Dominance and Competition
ix
48
49 50 51
52
53
54 58
59
60
200
202
  • Univers Univers
  • Ebooks Ebooks
  • Livres audio Livres audio
  • Presse Presse
  • Podcasts Podcasts
  • BD BD
  • Documents Documents