The flaws in the American electoral process have become increasingly apparent in recent years. The contemporary tipping point in public awareness occurred during the 2000 election count, and concern deepened due to several major problems observed in the 2016 campaign, worsening party polarization, and corroding public trust in the legitimacy of the outcome.To gather evidence about the quality of elections around the world, in 2012 the Electoral Integrity Project (EIP) was established as an independent research project based at Harvard and Sydney universities. The results show that experts rated American elections as the worst among all Western democracies. Without reform, these problems risk damaging the legitimacy of American elections-further weakening public confidence in political parties, Congress, and the U.S. government, depressing voter turnout, and exacerbating the risks of mass protests.Why American Elections Are Flawed describes several major challenges observed during the 2016 U.S. elections arising from deepening party polarization over basic voting procedures, the serious risks of hacking and weak cyber-security, the consequences of deregulating campaign spending, and lack of professional and impartial electoral management. Pippa Norris outlines the core concept and measure of electoral integrity, the key yardstick used to evaluate free and fair elections. Evidence from expert and mass surveys demonstrate the extent of problems in American elections. She shows how these challenges could be addressed through several practical steps designed to improve electoral procedures and practices. If implemented, the reforms will advance free and fair elections, and liberal democracy, at home and abroad.
Informations légales : prix de location à la page 0,7500€. Cette information est donnée uniquement à titre indicatif conformément à la législation en vigueur.
Extrait
W H Y A M E R I C A NE L E C T I O N S A R E F L A W E D ( A N D H O W T O F I X T H E M )
McCourtney Institute for Democracy
he Pennsyanîa Sae Unîersîy’s McCourney ïnsîue or Democracy (p://democracyînsîue.a.psu.edu) was ounded în as an înerdîscîpînary cener or researc, eacîng, and oureac on democracy. he însîue coor-dînaes înnoaîe programs and projecs în coaboraîon wî e Cener or Amerîcan Poîîca Responsîeness and e Cener or Democraîc Deîberaîon.
Laurence and Lynne Brown Democracy Medal
he aurence and ynne Brown Democracy Meda recog-nîzes ousandîng îndîîduas, groups, and organîzaîonsa produce excepîona înnoaîons o urer democracy îne Unîed Saes or around e word. ïn een numbered years, e meda spoîgs pracîca înnoaîons, suc as new însîuîons, aws, ecnoogîes, or moemens a ad-ance e cause o democracy. Awards gîen în odd num-bered years îgîg adances în democraîc eory a enrîc pîosopîca concepîons o democracy or empîrîca modes o democraîc beaîor, însîuîons, or sysems.
WHY A ME RICAN E LECTIONS ARE FL AWE D (AND HOW TO FIXTHEM)
PIPPA NORRIS
CORNELL SELECTS An împrîn o CORNE UNïVERSïTY PRESS ïtaca and London
Cornell Selects,an împrînt o Cornell Unîversîty Press, provîdes a orum or advancîng provocatîve îdeas and res vîewpoînts troug outstandîng dîgîtal and prînt publîcatîons. Longer tan an artîcle and sorter tan a book, tîtles publîsed under tîs împrînt explore a dîverse range o topîcs în a clear and concîse ormat—one desîgned to appeal to any reader. Cornell Selects publîca-tîons contînue te Press’s long tradîtîon o supportîng îg qualîty scolarsîp and sarîng ît wît te wîder communîty, promotîng a culture o broad înquîry tat îs a vîtal aspect o te mîssîon o Cornell Unîversîty.