In surveys, research university faculty often report that they value teaching more than their departments do. This incongruence holds implications for job satisfaction, stress, time spent on teaching, organizational continuity, and even student evaluations. Using an interactionist view of organizations, Mary C. Wright examines the reasons for this lack of agreement between the individual's values and perceptions of organizational leaders' views. She also examines departments in which there is a consensus about the value of teaching, specifically how formal policies, social networks around teaching, and chair leadership can offer an alternative work environment, or a culture of congruence around instruction. The practices and organizational arrangements of these departments offer lessons for administrators, faculty, and faculty developers who wish to create universities conducive to instructional enhancement. Because this book features extensive case studies of science departments, it also holds implications for those interested in constructing productive work environments and enhancing student learning in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) fields. Tables Acknowledgments
1. Introduction
2. Benefits of Instructional Congruence
3. "It's Like Bad Taste": How Interpretive Person-Organization Fit
4. Social Networks as Building Blocks for Congruence: Faculty That Chalk Together Talk Together
5. How Chairs Build Instructional Communities: Big Pictures Versus Big Impacts
6. Sharing the Value of Teaching: Ways to Build a Culture of Congruence
Informations légales : prix de location à la page 0,1498€. Cette information est donnée uniquement à titre indicatif conformément à la législation en vigueur.
Extrait
ALWAYS AT ODDS?
This page intentionally left blank.
ALWAYS AT ODDS?
Creatîng Aîgnment between Facuty and Admînîstratîve Vaues
MARY C. WRIGHT
State University of New York Press
Cover:Aternatîve Vîew, scupture by Mark Chatterey, ceramîc and stee, 60 x 72 x 12 înches, n.d. Photograph by Scupturesîte Gaery, San Francîsco, CA. Used by permîssîon.
No part of thîs book may be used or reproduced în any manner whatsoever wîthout wrîtten permîssîon. No part of thîs book may be stored în a retrîeva system or transmîtted în any form or by any means încudîng eectronîc, eectrostatîc, magnetîc tape, mechanîca, photocopyîng, recordîng, or otherwîse wîthout the prîor permîssîon în wrîtîng of the pubîsher.
For înformatîon, contact State Unîversîty of New York Press, Abany, NY www.sunypress.edu
Productîon, Laurîe Sear Marketîng, Anne M. Vaentîne
Library of Congress CataloginginPublication Data
Wrîght, Mary, 1971– Aways at odds : creatîng aîgnment between facuty and admînîstratîon vaues / Mary Wrîght. p. cm. Incudes bîbîographîca references and îndex. ISBN 978-0-7914-7367-2 (hardcover : ak. paper) ISBN 978-0-7914-7368-9 (pbk. : ak. paper) 1. Unîversîtîes and coeges—Unîted States—Facuty—Attîtudes. 2. Teacher-admînîstrator reatîonshîps—Unîted States. 3. Unîversîtîes and coeges—Unîted States— Admînîstratîon. 4. Communîcatîon în educatîon—Unîted States. I. Tîte.
LB2331.72.W75 2008 378.1'2—dc22
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
2007024501
to Russ and Laurea
This page intentionally left blank.
Tables
Acknowledgments
ONE
TWO
THREE
FOUR
FIVE
SIX
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
BENEFITS OF INSTRUCTIONAL CONGRUENCE
“IT'S LIKE BAD TASTE”: HOW INTERPRETIVE STRUCTURES CONTRIBUTE TO PERSONORGANIZATION FIT
SOCIAL NETWORKS AS BUILDING BLOCKS FOR CONGRUENCE: FACULTY THAT CHALK TOGETHER TALK TOGETHER
HOW CHAIRS BUILD INSTRUCTIONAL COMMUNITIES: BIG PICTURES VERSUS BIG IMPACTS
SHARING THE VALUE OF TEACHING: WAYS TO BUILD A CULTURE OF CONGRUENCE
Tabe 1: Facuty Respondents by Department (% of Department’s Facuty) Tabe 2: Number of Facuty Respondents by Rank (% of Department’s Facuty în Rank) Tabe 3: Code Names of Departments în the Study Tabe 4: Leves of Courses and Ranks of Instructors Incuded în the Student Ratîngs Comparîson Tabe 5: Comparîson of Student Ratîngs of Instructors and Courses by Department Tabe 6: Teachîng Tîes Tabe 7: Instructîona Leaders Tabe 8: Gender Composîtîon of Departments