Tracing the historical development of recent identity-based trends in literary theory to their roots in structuralism, Dorothy M. Figueira questions the extent to which theories and pedagogies of alterity have actually enabled us to engage the Other. She tracks academic attempts to deal with alterity from their inception in critical thought in the 1960s to the present. Focusing on multiculturalism and postcolonialism as professional and institutional practices, Figueira examines how such theories and pedagogies informed the academic and public discourse regarding September 11. She also investigates the theories and pedagogies of alterity as crucial elements in the bureaucratization of diversity within academe and discusses their impact on affirmative action. Acknowledgments Introduction
1. Critical Background to Postructuralist Theories and Pedagogies of Alterity
2. Multiculturalism
Simulated Battles The Institutionalization of Multiculturalism The Methodology of Multiculturalism Marketing the Margin Masking the Metanarrative of Race
3. Postcolonial Criticism and Identitarian Politics Definitions and the Scope of Postcolonial Criticism History and Postcolonial Subjectivity The Postcolonial Critic The Repressive Allure of Postcolonial Criticism
4. The Brahminization of Theory: Commodity Fetishism and False Consciousness
Introduction Postcolonial Criticism’s Disciplinary Roots Commodifying Postcolonial Theory and Type-Casting the Critic False Consciousness Commodity Fetishism and Brahminization
5. The Romance of Exile
Introduction Spokespersonship The Exile The Nomad A Wand’ring Minstrel I, A Thing of Shreds and Patches
6. Occidentalism
Theory Confronts Reality Rhetoric The Fallaci Affair Final Beliefs
7. Gestures of Inclusion
Introduction Positive Discrimination in India Affirmative Action in the United States Cosmetic Enhancement
Informations légales : prix de location à la page 0,1598€. Cette information est donnée uniquement à titre indicatif conformément à la législation en vigueur.
Extrait
This page intentionally left blank.
OTHERWISEOCCUPIED
This page intentionally left blank.
O O T H E RW I S EC C U P I E D
Pedagogies of Alterity and the Brahminization of Theory
DO ROT H Y M . FI G U E I R A
State U n ive r s i ty of N ew Yor k P re s s
Cover photograph: Duncan Searl,World Trade Center, 1974
Published by State University of New York Press, Albany
No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission. No part of this book may be stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means including electronic, electrostatic,magnetictape,mechanical,photocopying,recording,orotherwisewithout the prior permission in writing of the publisher.
For information, contact State University of New York Press, Albany, NY www.sunypress.edu
Production, Laurie Searl Marketing, Anne M. Valentine
Library of Congress CataloginginPublication Data
Figueira, Dorothy M. Otherwise occupied : pedagogies of alterity and the brahminization of theory / Dorothy M. Figueira. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-7914-7573-7 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Criticism—History—20th century. 2. Postmodernism. 3. Multiculturalism. I. Title.
PN94.F49 2008 801'.950904—dc22
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
2008000119
Acknowledgments
Introduction
1
2
3
4
C onte nt s
Critical Background to Poststructuralist Theories and Pedagogies of Alterity
Multiculturalism Simulated Battles 15 The Institutionalization of Multiculturalism 16 The Methodology of Multiculturalism 18 Marketing the Margin 24 Masking the Metanarrative of Race 27
Postcolonial Criticism and Identitarian Politics Definitions and the Scope of Postcolonial Criticism 31 History and Postcolonial Subjectivity 34 The Postcolonial Critic 36 The Repressive Allure of Postcolonial Criticism 43
The Brahminization of Theory: Commodity Fetishism and False Consciousness Introduction 50 Postcolonial Criticism’s Disciplinary Roots 53 Commodifying Postcolonial Theory and Type-Casting the Critic 59 False Consciousness 64 Commodity Fetishism and Brahminization 68
vii
1
5
15
31
49
vi
5
6
7
C ONTENTS
The Romance of Exile Introduction 71 Spokespersonship 72 The Exile 74 The Nomad 83 A Wand’ring Minstrel I, A Thing of Shreds and Patches 89
Occidentalism Theory Confronts Reality 91 Rhetoric 94 The Fallaci Affair 101 Final Beliefs 104
Gestures of Inclusion Introduction 107 Positive Discrimination in India 109 Affirmative Action in the United States 113 Cosmetic Enhancement 117
Conclusion: The Collecting of the Other
Notes
Bibliography
Index .
71
91
107
121
129
141
159
CONTENTS
Ac k nowle dg m e nt s
vii
Thirty years of personal experience within academe have gone into the composition of this volume. My career as a literary scholar was marked by my initial formation in France as a student in the social sciences. I began my studies attending the lectures of Lévi-Strauss in Paris and ended in the States as a student of Ricoeur and Gadamer. I came to comparative literature relatively late, after training as an historian of religions. This initial formation, perhaps, made me particularly insouciant regarding the theoretical gods for whom literary scholars were establishing altars in the 80s. Having already studied truly powerful deities, I remember thinking what paltry gods critics were now worshiping. As an Indologist, I witnessed with amazement the movement of India as a site of academic inquiry—from Harappan seals to the English novel. My experience as a first-generation “Hispanic”-American female has afforded me first-hand knowledge of affirmative action protocols and inspired interest in the politics of recent trends in identity studies. As a New Yorker, I was deeply effected, as we all were, by the events of September 11. As a critic, however, I was struck by how the ensuing discourse reflected themes that had become commonplace in the literature classroom. Moreover, all these experiences inform how I conceptualize my work and decode the profession. They also permit me to acknowledge how important itstillto is have a “face that fits” the establishment. Woe to those who don’t! I want to thank colleagues who have encouraged me and allowed me to present my thoughts in their classrooms and conferences—Jüri Talvet, (Tartu), Monika Schmitz-Emans (Bochum), Sergio Perosa (Venice/NYU), Satish Alekar (Pune), Manfred Schmeling (Saarbrücken), Koji Kawamoto (Tokyo), Chandra Mohan (Delhi), Meng Hua (Beijing), Jean Bessière (Paris), and Jasbhir Jain (Jaipur). I also want to thank colleagues such as Ronald Bogue and Farley Richmond (both of the University of Georgia), Gerald Gillespie (Stanford), John Burt Foster (George Mason University), and Alfred Lopez (Purdue University). I am deeply grateful to Jenny Webb for all her assistance in helping me clean
vii
viii
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
up the manuscript and check sources. I am also indebted to the comments of diligent anonymous readers and the most able editorial staff of the SUNY Press, especially Laurie Searl. I would also like to thank Nancy Ellegate of SUNY Press with whom I have had occasion to work in the past. I much appreciate how the SUNY Press has supported and marketed my work over the years. I would also like to thank my daughters Lila and Mira for their understanding. My husband John has been my ideal reader—insightful and constructive. I dedicate this book to my brothers, Thomas and Robert, who were born too early to benefit from their liminality.