Purity: The Reconfiguration of Our Souls

Alan Anderson Christopher

Description

In this article, the author looks at the necessity of purity for the reconfiguration of one's soul. The author is suggesting that illumination, in whatever its form, does not, and can not, arise from that which is impure. Author Bio: Christopher Alan Anderson (1950 - ) received the basis of his education from the University of Science and Philosophy, Swannanoa, Waynesboro, Virginia. He resides in the transcendental/romantic tradition, that vein of spiritual creativity of the philosopher and poet. His quest has been to define and express an eternal romantic reality from which a man and a woman could together stand in their difference and create a living universe of procreative love. Mr. Anderson began these writings in 1971. The first writings were published in 1985. On a personal note, when Mr. Anderson was asked to describe the writings and what he felt their message was he responded, "Spiritual procreation. Mankind has yet to distinguish the two sexes on the spiritual level. In this failure lies the root of our problems and why we cannot yet touch the eternal together. The message of man and woman balance brings each of us together in love with our eternal other half right now."

Sujets

• Dating

Informations

• Publié par: First Edition Design Publishing
• Date de parution: 19 août 2012
• Nombre de lectures: 0
• EAN13: 9781622871377
• Langue: English

Extrait

Purity: The Reconfiguration of Our Souls
Christopher Alan Anderson


First Edition Design Publishing
Purity: The Reconfiguration of Our Souls


Christopher Alan Anderson
Purity: The Reconfiguration of Our Souls
Copyright 2012 Christopher Alan Anderson
ISBN 978-1622871-37-7

Published and Distributed by
First Edition Design Publishing, Inc.
August 2012
www.firsteditiondesignpublishing.com



ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this book publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means ─ electronic, mechanical, photo-copy, recording, or any other ─ except brief quotation in reviews, without the prior permission of the author or publisher.
Foundation of Man and Woman Balance
www.manandwomanbalance.com
In the movie The Edge , 1997, Charles (played by Anthony Hopkins) says, “We are all put to the test, usually not in the form or at the point we choose.” Indeed. The te s t, in whatever its form, undoubtedly t akes us to our limits—or even beyond them. If you will allow me now, I will take you to your limit (and mine, too)—or even beyond. Why? To reconfigure our souls.

There w as another ch a racter in The Edge named Bob (pl a yed by Alec Baldwin). The movie goes something l ike thi s : C h arles and Bob get into a jam. Charles saves Bob's life. Bob tries to kill Charles. Y o u see, Bob held to some envy r e g ar ding Charles. And even though Charles saved Bob's life (at the li m it), Bob's soul was not reconfigured. The envy still lay at the root of him. So, even the saving of life was not enough to reconfi g ure a soul. What is then?

In a way T h e Edge represents the story of go o d and evil. Didn't Cain kill Abel out of envy? “Why do you get to have w h at I want?” says envy. Oh, but aren't some of us righteous, you ask. Is it righteous for the Christian to put his or her own salvati o n before others? Is it righteous for the Jew t o claim chosen s t atus before o the r s? Is it righteous for the Muslim to claim “God is great” while demanding others b e lie v e as he or s h e doe s ? Is it righ te ous for the mini s ters to ta k e y our money for the pr o mise of a better life i n the hereafter? Is it righteous for the politicians to take your money for the promise of a b etter life n ow? Is it righteous for you to make excuses for the Bobs’ (or Cains’) of the wo r ld?

For many y ears, I ha v e struggled with this iss u e of good and e v il. I suppose I thought that a certain understanding would suffice to reconfigure a so u l. But how can that be when the saving o f a life is not even enough? I have seen people “get it,” in new age p ar l ance. I have seen p e ople converted—a c tu a lly having t he expe