IBM and the Corruption of Justice in America

Earl Carey

Description

The dreadful, shocking truth of America's corrupt federal courts is finally exposed. The story the media covers up and will not tell the American people. The author spent four years representing himself in civil lawsuits against IBM and the United States government. By representing himself, he was able to penetrate the barrier of mystique and complexity which shields the operation of the corrupt judicial system from non-lawyers. The book clearly show how Federal judges routinely commit and cover-up criminal offenses with the full knowledge and blessing of both the Department of Justice and Congress.

In plain, simple English the book takes the reader on a terrifying insider's tour of the operation of the federal courts, the Department of Justice, and Congress. This book is an easy to read chronicle of one man's personal crusade against tyranny.

Sujets

• Litigation
• Droit et juridique
• Law

Informations

• Publié par: eBookIt.com
• Date de parution: 18 décembre 2019
• Nombre de lectures: 0
• EAN13: 9781456634162
• Langue: English

Extrait

IBM
AND THE CORRUPTION OF JUSTICE IN AMERICA
THE CAREY-GATE STORY
EARL CAREY
Bismarck House
St. Louis, Missouri
Copyright © 1992 by Earl Carey
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any informational storage or retrieval system — except by a reviewer who may quote brief passages in a review to be printed in a magazine or newspaper — without permission in writing from the publisher. For information contact Bismarck House, 1519 Twillman Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63138.
First printing 1992
Second printing 1992
 
To the memories of Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz and Patrick Henry. I hope they would have been proud.
 
The administration of justice is the firmest pillar of government.
George Washington
 
PREFACE
T he most cherished principle of the American way of life is summarized by the last words of the Pledge of Allegiance; “...with liberty and justice for all.” The acid test of a judicial system is the administration of justice when a large disparity exists between the money, power, and influence possessed by the parties to a lawsuit. The gravest concern is defined by the following question. Can a powerful defendant fix cases in federal court in America?
Watergate is the reigning champion as the worst scandal in American history. This book introduces a challenger to that dubious distinction, Carey-Gate. When the smoke clears the challenger will have soundly trounced and dethroned the twenty year old champion. Strong words? Consider this. The media diligently worked to expose the Watergate scandal. With Carey-Gate the media was an accomplice in the coverup. Imagine what sinister and evil crimes corrupt government officials can perpetrate when the media is on their side.
When anyone writes a book there is an inevitable gap between the author’s intellectual intent and the artistic execution of the words on the printed page. To minimize that gap, I made a conscious decision to violate a cardinal rule of writing and make unrestricted use of the personal pronoun “I”. During the past five years I have single handedly battled some of the most powerful, ruthless, and unscrupulous tyrants on the face of the planet. I have taken their best shots, and have never blinked. Perhaps as you read this book you will perceive my first person narrative style as being arrogant. If you do, please consider the circumstances and grant me your indulgence.
E arl C arey
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PREFACE
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 2: THE COMPLAINT
CHAPTER 3: EMPLOYMENT LAW
CHAPTER 4: DISCOVERY
CHAPTER 5: THE PROTECTIVE ORDER
CHAPTER 6: MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT
CHAPTER 7: DISCOVERY II
CHAPTER 8: INSIDE IBM
CHAPTER 9: THE IBM PRODUCTS
CHAPTER 10: THE TERMINATION
CHAPTER 11: THE PRETRIAL ORDER
CHAPTER 12: FRAUD AND EXTORTION
CHAPTER 13: JURY TRIAL DENIAL
CHAPTER 14: WRIT OF MANDAMUS
CHAPTER 15: JUDICIAL BIAS
CHAPTER 16: JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT
CHAPTER 17: PLEASE MR. POSTMAN
CHAPTER 18: SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CHAPTER 19: CRIMINAL OFFENSES
CHAPTER 20: JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT II
CHAPTER 21: CONGRESSMAN KYL AND SENATORS DeCONCINI AND McCAIN
CHAPTER 22: THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
CHAPTER 23: JUDICIAL HITMAN
CHAPTER 24: APPEAL FROM SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CHAPTER 25: SENATORS DANFORTH AND BOND, AND CONGRESSMAN CLAY
CHAPTER 26: THE COMPLAINT II
CHAPTER 27: THE GROUND RULES
CHAPTER 28: THE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
CHAPTER 29: KANGAROO COURT
CHAPTER 30: JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT III
CHAPTER 31: JUDICIAL BIAS II
CHAPTER 32: CASE DISMISSED AND JUDGMENT AFFIRMED
CHAPTER 33: THE UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON
CHAPTER 34: UNIVERSAL CORRUPTION
CHAPTER 35: SENATORS DANFORTH AND BOND II
CHAPTER 36: ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY TO MEDIA SCRUTINY
CHAPTER 37: HONOR AMONG THIEVES
CHAPTER 38: IBM UPDATE
CHAPTER 39: TYRANNY IN AMERICA
CHAPTER 40: THE SECOND AMERICAN REVOLUTION
APPENDIX
 
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
“Justice is not a cloistered virtue: she must be allowed to suffer the scrutiny and respectful even though outspoken comments of ordinary men.”
L ord J ames A tkin
“Y ou’re not a lawyer! You told me you’re not a lawyer. You’re obviously an educated, intelligent, erudite man. But you’re not a lawyer. And you’re presenting things to me that ordinarily would not be presented in this manner.”
Those are the words of a federal judge in St. Louis, Missouri. The “you” the judge refers to is your author. The occasion was a hearing on a lawsuit I had filed for the violation of my Constitutional rights. I am not a lawyer. I am a Pro Se. A Pro Se is a person who represents himself in court.
What strange manner of presentation had I employed that had so disturbed the judge? I had constructed my case on the law and the facts, using logical reasoning which would make the strictest high school geometry teacher beam with delight. The law and the facts were not distorted or perverted in any way. To make matters worse, everything I had written and said was the absolute truth. No wonder the judge was so upset. Such tactics are unheard of in federal court.
How did I wind up in federal court pleading a case for the violation of my Constitutional rights in the first place? The story began innocently enough. After nearly fourteen years of service my employer, IBM, terminated me. I consulted an attorney. On my behalf the attorney filed a lawsuit against IBM for breach of contract, fraud, and intentional infliction of emotional distress in state court in Arizona. Such employment related lawsuits are quite common. A body of law has evolved in this area. Many lawyers, mine in particular, specialize and limit their practice to employment related cases.
IBM immediately moved the case from Arizona state court to the federal court in Phoenix, Arizona. The initial exchanges of legal artillery fire confirmed my suspicions the judicial system had stacked the deck in favor of IBM. I concluded my best interests would be served by representing myself. Prior to the first court hearing I switched to Pro Se status.
As the case progressed my Constitutional rights fell like tenpins in the path of an IBM bowling ball. I fought back with the resolve and tenacity of a human pit bull. The FBI, the Department of Justice, various United States Senators and Congressmen, and the Senate Judiciary Committee became involved in this matter. Unfortunately, they all played the role of villains, and not heroes. Their black hats are unmistakable.
My case against IBM escalated into a national scandal, stretching literally from sea to shining sea. In keeping with the American tradition of naming scandals, the entire sordid affair was dubbed “Carey-Gate.” At least forty federal judges were entangled in its web. Glance at the appendix for a list of the names and locations of the known Carey-Gate judges.
The inner workings of our judicial system are hidden from public view by an opaque shroud of mystique and complexity. As a Pro Se, I was able to crash through this barrier. I was not a welcomed guest. This is not a world of loopholes, but rather a world where lawyers and judges routinely commit explicit criminal violations of the law, to enrich themselves and enable members of the corrupt establishment to exploit the American people.
Like a surgeon wielding a scalpel of truth I was able to dissect not only the federal courts, but also, the operation of the entire United States government. The biopsy reveals a malignant cancer of corruption which is destroying our nation. In this book I present the evidence and logical reasoning to prove these accusations. All legal terms and procedures are explained in plain, simple English. You do not have to be a legal bloodhound to track the scent of the law in Carey-Gate.
You may be curious as to the names mentioned in the dedication of this book. Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz was a German mathematician of the seventeenth century. Patrick Henry symbolized the American Revolution with the famous words, “give me liberty, or give me death.” The ideals which these two men represent were a source of inspiration to me. Armed with the logical reasoning of a German mathematician, and the courage of an American revolutionist, I challenged IBM, the judicial system, and the United States government. Here is my story.
 
CHAPTER 2: THE COMPLAINT
“I sometimes think that the most valuable by-product of a lawsuit against the tyrants of the day is that it flushes them out of their private haunts and subjects them to public scrutiny. ”
L OUIS N izer
O n July 29, 1988, after nearly fourteen years of service with the company IBM terminated my employment. I was not laid off, I was fired. At the time I was a salesman, or in IBM’s nomenclature, a marketing representative, in the IBM office in Phoenix, Arizona. On November 23, 1988, my attorney filed a complaint against IBM in Arizona state court alleging breach of contract, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and fraud.
The complaint is the document which initiates a lawsuit. The complaint identifies the parties; alleges the basis for the court’s jurisdiction; describes the nature of the legal wrong allegedly perpetrated by the defendant; describes the nature of the damages sustained by the plaintiff; and finally defines the relief or compensation demanded by the plaintiff.
The complaint is organized into numbered paragraphs or allegations. The defendant, in this case IBM, must file an answer to the complaint within twenty days. In my complaint the paragraphs are identified by standard numbers. IBM chose to respond by using Roman numerals. Don’t be confused by this trick. Dispensing with the first four paragraphs which pertain to legal housekeeping issues regarding jurisdiction, here are the pertinent allegations accompanied by IBM’s answers:
“Allegations Common To All Claims In January of 1987 Plaintiff began to