Twentieth-century Russia, in all its political incarnations, lacked the basic features of the Western liberal model: the rule of law, civil society, and an uncensored public sphere. In Slavophile Empire, the leading historian Laura Engelstein pays particular attention to the Slavophiles and their heirs, whose aversion to the secular individualism of the West and embrace of an idealized version of the native past established a pattern of thinking that had an enduring impact on Russian political life. Imperial Russia did not lack for partisans of Western-style liberalism, but they were outnumbered, to the right and to the left, by those who favored illiberal options.In the book's rigorously argued chapters, Engelstein asks how Russia's identity as a cultural nation at the core of an imperial state came to be defined in terms of this antiliberal consensus. She examines debates on religion and secularism, on the role of culture and the law under a traditional regime presiding over a modernizing society, on the status of the empire's ethnic peripheries, and on the spirit needed to mobilize a multinational empire in times of war. These debates, she argues, did not predetermine the kind of system that emerged after 1917, but they foreshadowed elements of a political culture that are still in evidence today.
Informations légales : prix de location à la page 0,7500€. Cette information est donnée uniquement à titre indicatif conformément à la législation en vigueur.
All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or parts thereof, must not be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher. For information, address Cornell University Press, Sage House, 512East State Street, Ithaca, New York14850.
First published2009by Cornell University Press First printing, Cornell Paperbacks,2009
Printed in the United States of America
Library of Congress CataloginginPublication Data
Engelstein, Laura. Slavophile empire : Imperial Russia’s Illiberal path / Laura Engelstein. p. cm. Includes index. ISBN9780801447402(cloth : alk. paper) — ISBN9780801475924(pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Russia—Politics and government—1801–1917.2. Political culture— Russia—History—19th century.3. Slavophilism—Russia—History—19th century.4. Liberalism—Russia—History—19th century.5. Russians—Ethnic identity—History—19th century.6. Nationalism—Russia—History—19th century.7. Religion and state—Russia—History—19th century.8. Russia— Intellectual life—1801–1917Title.. I. DK189.E542009 947.08—dc222009023344
Cornell University Press strives to use environmentally responsible suppliers and materials to the fullest extent possible in the publishing of its books. Such materials include vegetablebased, lowVOC inks and acidfree papers that are recycled, totally chlorinefree, or partly composed of nonwood fibers. For further information, visit our website at www.cornellpress.cornell.edu.
Preface Acknowledgments Introduction: The Discordant Choir 1 Combined Underdevelopment Discipline and the Law in Imperial and Soviet Russia 2and the Theater of Public Life Revolution The Triumph of Extremes 3Dream of Civil Society The The Law, the State, and Religious Toleration 4Russia in Modern Times Holy The Slavophile Quest for the Lost Faith 5 Orthodox SelfReflection in a Modernizing Age The Case of Ivan and Natal'ia Kireevskii 6 Between Art and Icon Aleksandr Ivanov’s Russian Christ 7Old Slavophile Steed The Failed Nationalism and the Philosophers’ Jewish Problem Index
ix xi 1 13
3
7
9
3
8
9
125
151
192
233
Preface
Twentiethcentury Russia—imperial, Soviet, or postSoviet—lacked the basic features of the Western liberal model: rule of law, civil society, and an uncensored public sphere. The autocracy and the Soviet regime rejected the model outright. It was adopted, briefly and ineffectually, between Feb ruary and October1917. After1991the Russian Federation again broke step, embracing a market economy, an unregulated press, and government by election. Under Putin, Russia has turned back, limiting freedom of ex pression, manipulating the laws, creating a form of statecentered capital ism, under a neonationalist flag. Even in negation, however, the Western model has exerted an obvious pull: nineteenthcentury Russian intellectu als measured their case against it; the1936Stalin Constitution claimed to grant the most absolute freedoms of all. Critics of the West held it to its own professed standards. In the last decades of the autocracy, however, voices endorsing the Western liberal perspective were outnumbered, to the right and to the left, by those who favored illiberal options. How Russia’s identity as a cultural nation at the core of an imperial state came to be defined, following the nineteenthcentury Slavophile model, in terms of an antiliberal consensus is the story at the heart of this book. Focusing on the center of the political spectrum, it examines debates on religion and secularism, on the role of culture and the law under a traditional regime presiding over a modernizing society, on the status of the empire’s ethnic peripheries, and on the spirit needed to mobilize a multinational empire in time of war. Such debates did not predetermine what emerged after 1917, but they foreshadowed elements of a political culture that are still in evidence today.