God Nature & Science

Jonathan Sumber

Description

Questions concerning the existence of God and the nature of the relationship between God, Nature and science have been topics that philosophers have been pondering over since the days of Plato and Socrates. In more recent years an interest in these topics have been rekindled, as the nature of reality itself is being questioned by many quantum physicists and philosophers as a result of what is being revealed in quantum research. While we are still a long way from being able to answer these questions through scientific methodology alone, quantum research continues to create information that has resulted in many researchers questioning if the universe within our perspective is the same as how the universe exists in the absence of it.

For example, the worldview shared by most people is that our realities are created within a corporeal universe, and through the gathering of information by our five senses; our minds process the information into a conscious perspective which allows us to have an awareness of ourselves and of the universe that is truly “out there” just as we perceive it to be. But, if the universe within our perspective is a function of our conscious awareness, consciousness may be creating what we perceive rather than being passive by simply allowing us to perceive a corporeal universe that is truly out there. If so, it creates the likelihood that we will not be able to answer questions concerning the relationship between God, nature, and science until we have a much better understanding of the true nature of consciousness and from where all that we perceive within it, originates.

This work explores how the fundamental character and qualities of God, nature and science as we presently conceptualize each to be, along with how their relationship with one another would be altered if consciousness was not passive in the creation of our reality, while proposing a philosophical system of physics that defines how this could occur.

Sujets

• Philosophie
• Métaphysique
• Philosophie de la religion
• Essays
• Religious
• PHILOSOPHY
• Philosophie et théologie
• Metaphysics

Informations

• Publié par: Outskirts Press
• Date de parution: 08 août 2023
• Nombre de lectures: 0
• EAN13: 9781977266378
• Langue: English

Extrait

-->

God Nature & Science All Rights Reserved. Copyright © 2023 Jonathan Sumber V2.0
The opinions expressed in this manuscript are solely the opinions of the author and do not represent the opinions or thoughts of the publisher. The author has represented and warranted full ownership and/or legal right to publish all the materials in this book.
This book may not be reproduced, transmitted, or stored in whole or in part by any means, including graphic, electronic, or mechanical without the express written consent of the publisher except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews.
Outskirts Press, Inc. http://www.outskirtspress.com
Cover Photo © 2023 www.gettyimages.com . All rights reserved - used with permission.
Outskirts Press and the "OP" logo are trademarks belonging to Outskirts Press, Inc.
PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Table of Contents
Introduction
Chapter One
1. Introduction to the reallusion hypothesis.
2. A brief explanation of the tenets of the reallusion hypothesis that are relevant to this work.
3. Explanation for how the entire lifespan of the universe was able to evolve from the Big Bang to its demise in the absence of the passage of time and without any affect from the actions of conscious living things.
4. The creation of the two components of time.
Chapter two
1. The relationship between God, Nature, and Science.
Introduction
For many Millennia, philosophers have pondered over the existence of God and how we fit into his plan. These questions remain to be just as much of a mystery today as they were thousands of years ago. lf we ask ourselves what the relationship between God, Nature, and science is; a general answer could be that Nature is the implementation of God's plan and the reason for everything in the universe to be what it is, while Nature works within the laws of science. Most religions would define God to be an omniscient, omnipresent, divine, and beatific entity that created the universe and the laws of physics that everything within the universe functions within. Most religions would add that our conscience is a nontangible component of Nature, for although our conscience is undisputedly a component of our cognitive development, mediated by our DNA as well as being influenced by cultural attitudes along with other learned behaviors; the religious significance of our conscience is within our spiritual connection with God through Nature; for Nature is Gods' way of implementing his plan for us and throughout the universe, and our conscience is one component of that plan.
From within our present understanding of the nature of the universe, Nature is conceptualized to embody all the natural forces that together, keep balance and harmony between all ecosystems and living things, so that everything within our world here on the Earth as well as everything else within the universe can evolve to its highest level as it functions within the physics of all the branches of science. Although this is true, this work proposes that the full scope of Nature goes far beyond governing the physical properties of the universe and beyond the physics that are involved in that effect, and that the primary role of nature is the evolution of consciousness rather than the evolution of the universe.
Before presenting the system of physics that defines the worldview at the foundation of this work, l would like to briefly introduce a couple of its central tenets. One is that consciousness is not created within our minds. This statement is being made with respect to the accepted present understanding of what our minds refer to. For example, our minds and the minds of all conscious living things are presently understood to be limited to the product of the processes that take place within their brains, which are made of matter and exist within the universe. Thus, it is being proposed that although the mind creates all the information that is needed for all aspects of cognition and perception; our minds and the minds of all conscious things are not able to process the information that they create, into consciousness and a conscious perspective. As will be explained within upcoming sections; the Standard Model of particle physics that the universe functions within lacks two quantum properties that are needed to process the information that the mind creates, into a conscious perspective. Thus, since consciousness cannot be created within our minds and our minds exists within the universe, it is also being proposed that consciousness does not exist within the universe as it functions within one version of the Standard Model of particle physics, while our minds and the rest of the universe function within a slightly different version of the Standard Model. Thus, it is being proposed that consciousness is not created within the universe, and because of this, consciousness is not part of our minds, even though our minds create all the information that consciousness uses to think, and to perceive the universe.
A way to help conceptualize what is being proposed is to modify our present concept of what our minds represent. lnstead of the totality of all that our minds entail to include only that which takes place within the matter of our brains; our minds could be redefined as comprising two separate components: one component is our brain. Our brains are made of matter that at its fundamental level, exist and function within the embodiment of a type of data, along with how the rest of the universe exists on its own. The other component of our mind is consciousness. lt is created within and functions within the embodiment of a slightly different system of data that is external to the data-state that the universe and our minds exist and function within. Each data-state functions within its own version of the Standard Model of particle physics. The two versions of the Standard Model are almost identical to one another with only a few exceptions that will be defined within sections to follow. lt is being proposed that we perceive our reality from within our consciousness as consciousness exists within the physics of a quantum system of data, while all that we perceive originates from within a different system of physics from within a subquantum system of data. Together, both components of our mind create our reality, as both components communicate with one another within a third system of physics that will also be defined in sections to follow. Although this definition of our minds is a more inclusive and accurate way to conceptualize what is involved in the creation of our realities and the totality of our minds; it should be understood that when referring to the mind in the rest of this work, the inferrence only includes what takes place within the matter of our brains, so that it is consistent with the way that the mind is presently conceptualized to be, to minimize any ambiguities within the rest of this work.
The reason for why our minds create all the information that is needed for all aspects of cognition and perception, but can't process the information into consciousness and a conscious perspective, will be explained in this work, as the answer will reveal that our lives within this reality are just one act along the evolutionary path of consciousness, and why consciousness is independent to the universe and to our minds from within it.
To help conceptualize what is being proposed, consider that our minds exist within the collective total of all the processes within our brains that create all aspects of cognition and that process the information that is being collected by our five senses, into all the different perceptions that we perceive the universe within. Our brains consist of matter from within the universe, and matter like everything else within the universe, functions within the laws of physics from within all the branches of science as they adhere to the Standard Model of particle physics at the most fundamental level. Thus, as our minds exist within our brains, and as our brains exist within the universe as the universe exists on its own, our minds function within the Standard Model of particle physics that the universe functions within. But aside from this, the tenets of the system of physics that are at the foundation of this work, propose that the quantum particles that exist within the universe as the universe exists on its own and functions within the Standard Model of particle physics that the universe functions within, do not create anything with a physical expression, even at the large-scale level of order. This means, the universe is not really "out there" as we perceive it to be.
The explanation for why this is, defines the fundamental nature of our reality, for in the absence of our conscious perspective, the universe reverts to a process that in concept, can be compared to the data within a virtual reality computer program that functions within the subquantum level of order. This being Nature's version of what is being compared to a virtual reality program, is inconceivably more advanced in every way than even a quantum program within a quantum computer of the future, and because Nature has access to a system of physics from within the subquantum level of order, the nature of the subquantum data-state of the universe and the physics that create it, are likely not similar to anything that we have knowledge about or have created. Thus, it is being proposed that instead of the universe having a physical expression on its own and being "out there" as we perceive it to be; the universe has evolved so that it only has a physical expression within a conscious perspective, while the manner in which it exists on its own within the subquantum level of order, is beyond any technology or physics that we presently have or know about, leaving nothing else other than a virtual reality program to make an analogy to.
As the universe is given