Making Evil

Julia Shaw

Description

Are you evil?In Making Evil, Julia Shaw uses a mix of science, popular culture and real-life examples to investigate the darker side of human nature. How similar is your brain to a psychopath's? How many people have murder fantasies? Can AI be evil? Do your sexual proclivities make you a bad person? Who becomes a terrorist? This is a surprising and wickedly entertaining exploration of a darkly compelling subject.

Sujets

• Sociologie, société et politique
• Popular psychology
• Psychology

Informations

• Publié par: Canongate Books
• Date de parution: 07 février 2019
• Nombre de lectures: 0
• EAN13: 9781786891310
• Langue: English
• Poids de l'ouvrage: 2 Mo

Extrait

Dr Julia Shaw is a scientist in the Department of Psychology at University College London (UCL). Her academic work, teaching and role as an expert witness have focused on different ways of understanding criminal behaviour. Dr Shaw has consulted as an expert on criminal cases, delivered police-training and military workshops, and has evaluated offender diversion programmes. She is also the co-founder of Spot, a start-up that helps employees report workplace harassment and discrimination, and employers take action. Her work has been featured in outlets such as CNN , the BBC, the New Yorker , WIRED , Forbes , the Guardian and Der Spiegel . She is the co-host of the podcast Bad People. @drjuliashaw | drjuliashaw.com
Also by Dr Julia Shaw
The Memory Illusion


The paperback edition published in Great Britain in 2020 by Canongate Books First published in Great Britain in 2019 by Canongate Books Ltd, 14 High Street, Edinburgh EH1 1TE This digital edition first published in 2019 by Canongate Books
canongate.co.uk
Copyright © Dr Julia Shaw, 2019Illustrations © Dr Julia Shaw The right of Dr Julia Shaw to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by her in accordancewith the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 Every effort has been made to trace copyright holders and obtain their permission for the use of copyright material. The publisher apologises for any errors or omissions and would be grateful if notified of any corrections that should be incorporated in future reprints or editions of this book.‘First they came . . .’ © Martin Niemöller, as found in Exile in the Fatherland: Martin Niemöller’s Letters from Moabit, ed. Hubert G. Locke (Wm. B. Eerdman, 1986) British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available on request from the British Library ISBN 978 1 78689 132 7 eISBN 978 1 78689 131 0
To the insatiably curious
CONTENTS
Introduction: The Hunger
1. Your Inner Sadist: The Neuroscience of Evil
On Hitler’s brain, aggression and psychopathy
2. Murder by Design: The Psychology of Bloodlust
On serial killers, toxic masculinity and ethical dilemmas
3. The Freak Show: Deconstructing Creepiness
On clowns, evil laughs and mental illness
4. Two-faced Tech: How Technology Changes Us
On air pirates, bad bots and cyber trolls
5. Kinky as F*ck: The Science of Sexual Deviance
On S&M, coming out and zoophilia
6. To Catch a Predator: Understanding Paedophiles
On understanding, preventing and humanising
7. Snakes in Suits: The Psychology of Groupthink
On paradoxes, slavery and ethical blindness
8. And I Said Nothing: The Science of Compliance
On Nazis, rape culture and terrorism
Conclusion
Acknowledgements
Notes
Index
‘He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster.’
Friedrich Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil
INTRODUCTION: THE HUNGER
T HE FAMOUS NINETEENTH-CENTURY German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche wrote in 1881: ‘ Böse denken heißt böse machen ’ – thinking evil means making evil. 1 Only when we assign something the label ‘evil’, only when we think that something is evil, does it become so. Nietzsche argued that evil is a subjective experience, not something that is inherent to a person, or object, or action. 2
This book explores some of the science behind this sentiment, ranging across a spectrum of concepts and notions that are often associated with the word evil. It is a study of human hypocrisy, the absurdity of evil, ordinary madness and empathy. I hope to challenge you to rethink and reshape what it means to be bad.
Over the past thirteen years, as a student, lecturer and researcher, I have enjoyed discussing the science of evil with anyone who is willing to listen. What I like most is destroying the fundamental conceptualisations of good and evil as black and white, replacing them with nuance and scientific insight. I want us all to have a more informed way of discussing behaviour that at first we feel we cannot, and should not, begin to understand. Without understanding, we risk dehumanising others, writing off human beings simply because we don’t comprehend them. We can, we must, try to understand that which we have labelled evil.
Let’s start by doing an evil empathy exercise. Think about the worst thing you have ever done. Something that you are probably ashamed of, and that you know would make other people think less of you. Infidelity. Theft. Lying. Now imagine that everyone knew about it. Judged you for it. Constantly called you names arising from it. How would that feel?
We would hate for the world to forever judge us based on the acts we most regret. Yet this is what we do to others every day. For our own decisions we see the nuances, the circumstances, the difficulties. For others we often just see the outcome of their decisions. This leads us to define human beings, in all their complexity, by a single heinous term. Murderer. Rapist. Thief. Liar. Psychopath. Paedophile.
These are labels bestowed on others, based on our perception of who they must be, given their behaviour. A single word intended to summarise someone’s true character and to disparage it, to communicate to others that this person cannot be trusted. This person is harmful. This person is not really a person at all – rather some sort of horrible aberration. An aberration with whom we should not try to empathise because they are so hopelessly bad that we will never be able to understand them. Such people are beyond understanding, beyond saving, evil.
But who are ‘they’? Perhaps understanding that every single one of us frequently thinks and does things that others view as despicable will help us to understand the very essence of what we call evil. I can guarantee that someone in the world thinks you are evil. Do you eat meat? Do you work in banking? Do you have a child out of wedlock? You will find that things that seem normal to you don’t seem normal to others, and might even be utterly reprehensible. Perhaps we are all evil. Or, perhaps none of us are.
As a society, we talk about evil a lot, and yet we don’t really talk about it at all. Every day we hear of the latest human atrocities, and superficially engage with constant news chatter that makes us feel like humanity is surely doomed. As journalists often say, if it bleeds it leads. Concepts that elicit strong emotions are distilled into attention-grabbing headlines for newspapers and shoved into our social-media feeds. Seen before we get to breakfast and forgotten by lunchtime, our consumption of reports of evil is phenomenal.
Our hunger for violence in particular seems greater now than it ever has. In a study published in 2013 by psychological scientist Brad Bushman and his colleagues which examined violence in movies, they found that ‘violence in films has more than doubled since 1950, and that gun violence in PG-13 films [12A] has increased to the point where it recently exceeded the rate in R-rated films [15]’. 3 Movies are becoming more violent, even those which are specifically for children to watch. More than ever, stories of violence and severe human suffering permeate our daily routine.
What does this do to us? It distorts our understanding of the prevalence of crime, making us think crime is more common than it actually is. It impacts who we label evil. It changes our notions of justice.
At this point I want to manage your expectations regarding what this book is about. This is not a book that dives deep into individual cases. Whole books have been dedicated to specific people who are often referred to as evil – like Jon Venables, the youngest person ever to be convicted of murder in the UK and labeled by the tabloids as ‘Born Evil’, or serial killer Ted Bundy in the US, or the ‘Ken and Barbie killers’, Paul Bernardo and Karla Homolka, in Canada. These are fascinating cases, no doubt, but this book is not really about them. It is about you. I want you to understand your own thoughts and proclivities more than I want to pick apart specific examples of other people’s transgressions.
This is also not a philosophical book, a religious book, or a book about morality. It is a book that tries to help us understand why we do terrible things to one another, not whether these things should happen or what the appropriate punishments for them are. It is a book filled with experiments and theories, a book that tries to turn our attention to science for answers. It tries to break down the concept of evil into many pieces, and to pick up each one to examine it individually.
This is also not a comprehensive book about evil. A lifetime would be insufficient for such a task. You may be disappointed to learn that I will spend almost no time discussing crucial issues like genocide, abuse of children in care, children who commit crime, election fraud, treachery, incest, drugs, gangs or war. If you want to learn about such issues, there are many books out there for you, but this isn’t one of them. This is a book that seeks to expand on the currently available literature and bring in the unexpected. This book provides an overview of important and diverse topics related to the concept of evil that I think are fascinating, important, and often overlooked.
MONSTER HUNTING
Before we slip into the science of evil, let me explain who I am and why you can trust me to walk with you through your nightmares.
I come from a world where people hunt monsters. Where police officers, prosecutors and the public collectively take their pitchforks and search for murderers and rapists. They hunt because they want to maintain the fabric of society, to punish those who are perceived to have done wrong. The problem is that these monsters sometimes don’t actually exist.
As a criminal psychologist who specialises in false memories, I see cases all the time where people search for an evil perpetrator even though no transgression has actually taken place. F